Uniform Apply Interface for Financial Transaction Linking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current financial management systems have cumbersome and non-standardized transaction linking processes, with multiple apply systems for different account modules, leading to complexity, high maintenance costs, and limited functionality.

Innovation Solution

A standardized apply system with a uniform interface that allows users to easily apply any transaction to any other transaction, independent of the account module, using generic transactions with a standardized structure, and storing apply records in a database.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate apply systems are used for each account module, then each module can handle its specific transaction linking needs, but the system complexity increases and maintenance costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction linking capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal apply system that can handle transaction linking across multiple account modules (accounts payable, accounts receivable, general ledger, bank manager, payroll, inventory, order entry) through a single standardized interface. This eliminates the need for separate apply systems for each module, reducing system complexity while maintaining the ability to handle module-specific requirements through configuration rather than structural duplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple non-standardized apply systems are implemented, then each account module can be customized, but the ease of operation decreases and user experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule customizationVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a single standardized apply interface that works consistently across all account modules, improving ease of operation and user experience. Users learn one interface paradigm that applies universally, eliminating the need to adapt to different interfaces for different modules while still allowing module-specific functionality through standardized configuration mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains module-specific capabilities by changing parameters and configuration settings within the standardized interface rather than requiring different interface structures. This allows customization for each account module while preserving a consistent user experience through parameter-based adaptation rather than structural variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If separate apply systems are used for each account module, then specific module requirements can be met, but maintenance costs and difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule-specific functionalityVSAvoidmaintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate apply systems into a single unified apply system that serves all account modules. This consolidation reduces maintenance difficulty and costs by eliminating redundant codebases and interface implementations while maintaining module-specific functionality through a standardized configuration framework that allows targeted modifications without affecting the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If a standardized apply system is implemented, then system complexity and maintenance costs are reduced, but the ability to handle module-specific nuances may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmodule-specific handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized apply system handles module-specific nuances through parameter changes and configuration settings rather than structural modifications. This allows the system to maintain low complexity with a single codebase while adapting to specific module requirements by changing operational parameters, data mappings, and configuration values within the standardized framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7634444B2Method and apparatus for applying/linking transactions in a financial management system
Publication Date: 2009.12.15 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US7634444B2 patent drawing
  • US7634444B2 patent drawing
  • US7634444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented financial management system that includes a standardized apply system that, in general, allows a user to relatively easily apply any transaction/document to any other transaction/document. The apply system includes a uniform apply interface that is configured to receive at least two generic transactions. The uniform apply interface applies at least a portion of one of the at least two generic transactions to at least a portion of another one of the at least two generic transactions to produce at least one apply record. The at least one apply record is stored in a database.