Universal Armrest Assembly with Selective Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft seating designs lack versatility and safety features, with tray tables often obstructing passenger space, fixed or pivotable armrests being non-interchangeable, and controllers being inconveniently located within armrests, which limits adaptability and safety during crashes.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates tray tables positioned within seat backs with arms within the seat back envelopes, universal armrests that can be configured as fixed or pivotable, and controllers mounted on seat frames for direct routing and reduced complexity, along with luggage bars that absorb bending stresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If tray tables are positioned within seat backs with arms within seat back envelopes, then passenger space obstruction is reduced, but tray table accessibility and deployment complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger spaceVSAvoidtray table deployment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray table is nested within the seat back envelope, with the table and its support arms contained within the spatial boundaries of the seat back structure. This nesting approach reduces obstruction of passenger space while integrating the tray table mechanism into the existing seat back volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The tray table system is segmented into multiple components (table surface, support arms, deployment mechanism) that can be independently positioned and controlled. The support arms are separable from the main table structure, allowing for simplified deployment and stowage sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If universal armrests are made interchangeable between fixed and pivotable configurations, then adaptability and versatility improve, but structural complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmrest configuration flexibilityVSAvoidarmrest assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single armrest assembly design serves multiple functions by accommodating both fixed and pivotable configurations through selectable locking mechanisms. The same basic armrest structure can be installed in either configuration depending on the specific seating application, eliminating the need for separate fixed and pivotable armrest designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The armrest assembly incorporates a selectable locking mechanism that allows the structure to transition between a fixed configuration (for maximum stability) and a pivotable configuration (for enhanced comfort and adjustability). This dynamic capability is achieved through interchangeable locking components rather than fundamentally different structural designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If controllers are mounted on seat frames for direct routing, then cable routing complexity and safety are improved, but armrest design simplicity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable routing safetyVSAvoidarmrest assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controllers are extracted from the armrest assembly and mounted directly on the seat frame structure. This extraction eliminates the need for controllers to be integrated into the moving armrest components, thereby improving cable routing safety by keeping control electronics in a fixed, protected location on the seat frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The seat frame serves as an intermediary mounting platform for the controllers, providing a stable and safe location that is separate from the armrest assembly. This intermediary positioning allows for direct cable routing to the seat frame without requiring complex cable management within the armrest structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If tray tables function as energy-absorption elements during crashes, then passenger safety improves, but structural design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidtray table structural design
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray table structure is designed to utilize crash forces as a beneficial energy-absorption mechanism. During a collision, the tray table and its support arms are engineered to deform and absorb impact energy, converting the harmful crash forces into useful energy dissipation that protects passengers. This approach transforms a potential safety hazard into a protective feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The tray table assembly incorporates composite structural elements that provide both normal-use functionality and crash-energy-absorption capabilities. The structure may combine materials with different mechanical properties to achieve optimal performance, where certain components are designed to yield or deform in controlled ways during impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3181450B1An arm rest assembly
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 ZODIAC SEATS FRANCE
  • EP3181450B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3181450B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3181450B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to an arm rest assembly comprising: - an arm rest, - a mounting bosshead (308) defining a curved slot (336) and comprising a curved boss (340), and - a pin (316) received by the curved slot (336) and defining a groove, the pin (316) configured for receipt by the curved slot (336) in a selected first or second position, the first position having the curved boss (340) aligned with the groove so as to permit travel of the pin (316) within the curved slot (336) and pivoting of the arm rest relative to the mounting bosshead (308) and the second position having the curved boss (340) misaligned with the groove so as to prevent pivoting of the arm rest relative to the mounting bosshead (308).