Universal Replacement Bottom Assembly Kit for Waste Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for refurbishing commercial waste container bottoms are complex and costly due to the need for custom-sized replacements, which does not account for the variety of designs and sizes in use, leading to inefficiencies and environmental impacts from frequent replacements.

Innovation Solution

A two-piece base assembly kit that can be adjusted to fit a wide range of commercial waste containers, including enhanced load rails and end caps for durability and safety, allowing for standardization and nesting for compact shipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If custom-sized bottoms are fabricated for each container, then the bottom fits the specific container design, but the refurbishing process becomes complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvefit to specific container designVSAvoidrefurbishing process complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a standardized bottom assembly that can fit multiple container sizes and designs. The bottom includes adjustable features such as extendable sides and configurable support legs, allowing a single bottom design to serve multiple container types, thereby reducing refurbishing complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom assembly is segmented into modular components including the base plate, extendable sides, support legs, and mounting brackets. This segmentation allows individual components to be adjusted or replaced independently, simplifying the refurbishing process while maintaining compatibility with various container designs.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If custom-sized bottoms are fabricated for each container, then the bottom fits the specific container design, but the refurbishing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvefit to specific container designVSAvoidrefurbishing cost

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized bottom assembly design allows a single product to replace multiple custom fabrications. The universal design with adjustable components reduces manufacturing costs through economies of scale while maintaining the ability to fit different container sizes and designs, thereby reducing refurbishing costs.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom assembly incorporates adjustable parameters such as side extensions and leg positions that can be configured to match different container specifications. This allows a single standardized bottom to adapt to various container sizes and designs without requiring custom fabrication, reducing refurbishing costs.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a universal bottom design is used, then the refurbishing process is simplified, but the fit to specific container designs may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverefurbishing process simplicityVSAvoidfit to container design

Core Design Contradiction:

Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom assembly incorporates dynamic adjustable features including extendable sides, movable support legs, and configurable mounting positions. These dynamic elements allow the standardized bottom to adapt its configuration to match specific container designs, maintaining proper fit while preserving refurbishing process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The modular segmented design allows individual components to be adjusted independently to achieve proper fit for specific container designs. The segmentation enables customization through simple assembly variations rather than complete custom fabrication, maintaining both simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple bottom sizes are stocked for different container types, then various container designs can be serviced, but shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveservice capability for various container designsVSAvoidshipping cost

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By stocking a limited quantity of universal bottom assemblies instead of multiple custom-sized bottoms, the company reduces inventory volume and shipping requirements. The universal design maintains service capability for various container types through its adjustable features, thereby reducing shipping costs while preserving versatility.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal bottom design merges the functionality of multiple custom-sized bottoms into a single standardized product. This consolidation reduces the total quantity of inventory needed and decreases shipping volume, while the adjustable features maintain the ability to service various container designs.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11034513B2Universal replacement bottom assembly kit for commercial waste containers

Publication Date: 2021.06.15 PLASTIC RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES CORP

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a commercial waste container bottom assembly kit, capable of fitting a wide range of waste container and dumpster sizes. The system includes additional features such as an enhanced commercial waste container load rail and joggled end caps. The advantages over traditional methods of replacing container bottoms are significant.