Universal Transport Container for Eyeglass Lenses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The eyeglass lens industry lacks a uniform container concept and adapted process chain for transporting and processing spectacle lenses and blanks, leading to inefficiencies and contamination during various manufacturing stages.

Innovation Solution

A transport container system with interchangeable inserts and adapter containers that accommodate spectacle lenses or blanks at different axial dimensions, ensuring precise positioning and orientation, and allowing for the inclusion of additional components like spectacle frames and polishing tools, thereby streamlining the manufacturing process and reducing container variability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If different transport containers are used for different manufacturing stages (basic glass production, cleaning, coloring, hard coating), then specific requirements for each stage are met, but container variability increases and process efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestage-specific container requirementsVSAvoidcontainer variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal base container design that can serve multiple manufacturing stages through interchangeable inserts. The base container maintains consistent dimensions and interface standards, while different inserts (e.g., for basic glass production, cleaning, coloring, hard coating) provide stage-specific functionality. This eliminates the need for multiple different container types, reducing container variability while meeting specific requirements for each manufacturing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The container system is segmented into a standardized base container and interchangeable inserts. Each insert is designed for a specific manufacturing stage or function, allowing the system to adapt to different requirements without changing the entire container. This segmentation enables the base container to remain uniform while the inserts provide the necessary stage-specific characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If standardized axial dimension of 130 mm is used for basic glass processing machines, then machine compatibility is improved, but incompatibility arises with control and packaging systems that require 112.5 mm axial dimension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine compatibilityVSAvoidaxial dimension incompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs interchangeable inserts that can be dynamically swapped in the base container to change the axial dimension configuration. When working with basic glass processing machines, inserts with 130 mm axial dimension are used. When transitioning to control and packaging systems, inserts with 112.5 mm axial dimension are inserted. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the same base container to adapt to different axial dimension requirements without physical incompatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The axial dimension parameter of the container system is made changeable through interchangeable inserts. The base container maintains a universal interface, while the inserts provide different axial dimensions (130 mm for basic glass processing, 112.5 mm for control and packaging systems) as needed. This parameter change capability resolves the incompatibility between different system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If containers are reused across multiple manufacturing stages, then resource efficiency improves, but contamination risk increases due to mechanical processing residues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer reuse efficiencyVSAvoidcontamination from mechanical processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the contamination-prone elements into removable inserts that can be stage-specific. For example, inserts used during basic glass production (which involves mechanical processing) are separate from those used during cleaning or coloring stages. The inserts can be removed, cleaned, or replaced as needed, preventing cross-contamination between stages while allowing the base container to be reused. This extraction of contamination risk from the reusable base container maintains productivity while protecting against harmful residues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The interchangeable inserts act as intermediaries between the base container and the manufacturing process. They protect the base container from direct contact with contaminants during mechanical processing stages. The inserts can be discarded or cleaned separately, serving as a barrier that enables base container reuse without contamination transfer to subsequent clean stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple specialized containers are used for different processes, then process-specific optimization is achieved, but reorientation and readjustment time increases during transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess-specific optimizationVSAvoidreorientation and readjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple process-specific container functions into a single universal base container through the use of interchangeable inserts. Instead of physically moving between different specialized containers, the system combines them into one container that can be reconfigured by swapping inserts. This merging eliminates the time-consuming process of moving entire containers and reorienting them, while maintaining the process-specific optimization benefits through the specialized inserts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The inserts are pre-configured for specific manufacturing stages with all necessary positioning features and geometries already in place. When transitioning between stages, the pre-prepared inserts are simply swapped in, eliminating the need for time-consuming reorientation and readjustment. The preliminary preparation of stage-specific inserts resolves the time loss associated with container transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2321200B1Transport container system for prescription eyeglass lens production and method for transporting eyeglass lenses and/or eyeglass lens blanks
Publication Date: 2016.11.02 CARL ZEISS VISION GMBH
  • EP2321200B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2321200B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2321200B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a transport container system (100) for eyeglass lenses and/or eyeglass lens blanks, having a base container (1) having a first insert receptacle (7) for receiving a first insert (21) in an oriented manner for receiving an eyeglass lens or an eyeglass lens blank, and a second insert receptacle (8) for receiving a second insert (21) in an oriented manner for receiving an eyeglass lens or an eyeglass lens blank. The invention further relates to a method for transporting eyeglass lenses or blanks, having a transport container system. The transport container system (100) comprises a first pair of identical inserts (21) for the first and second insert receptacles (7, 8). The inserts (21) each comprise an eyeglass lens receptacle (35) for receiving an eyeglass lens or an eyeglass lens blank in an oriented manner, and can be inserted in the first and second insert receptacles (7, 8) such that the geometric means of the eyeglass lenses or eyeglass lens blanks properly received by the first pair of identical inserts are disposed at a first distance to each other. According to the invention, a second pair of identical inserts (41, 61), deviating from the first pair, are provided for the first and second insert receptacles (7, 8).