Universal Life Saving System Voice Alert Drone Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical alert systems are limited in scope, costly, and ineffective for unpredictable life threats and emergency situations beyond known medical conditions, as they only cover a small geographic area and require ongoing fees, failing to address a broad range of life-threatening situations such as stalking, kidnapping, or unexpected emergencies.

Innovation Solution

A universal life-saving system (ULSS) utilizing advanced computer technologies, communication technologies, and computer networking to connect alert senders with pre-defined responders through a network of computer systems, enabling timely and precise responses via robotic teams, including drones and driverless cars, and allowing voice-over-IP communication for emergency situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional medical alert systems are used, then coverage is limited to known medical conditions and small geographic areas, but the system becomes ineffective for unpredictable life threats and emergencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage scopeVSAvoideffectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to handle multiple types of emergencies beyond medical conditions, including stalking, kidnapping, natural disasters, and accidents. The platform accepts alerts from any user and routes them to appropriate responders, making it universally applicable to diverse emergency scenarios rather than being specialized for single-condition monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its response based on the type of emergency, user location, and available responders. It automatically adjusts alert routing, responder selection, and communication methods according to the specific situation, transforming from a static medical alert system to a dynamic emergency response platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If traditional medical alert systems are used, then ongoing fees are required, but the system becomes costly and inaccessible

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates ongoing monitoring fees by enabling users to self-manage their safety profiles, emergency contacts, and alert preferences. Users can independently configure their emergency information and initiate alerts without requiring continuous paid monitoring services, making the system accessible without recurring costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces expensive continuous monitoring services with a free or low-cost alert generation mechanism. Instead of maintaining costly ongoing connections to monitoring centers, users can generate alerts as needed using available communication technologies, eliminating the need for expensive sustained service subscriptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Area of stationary object

If traditional medical alert systems are used, then geographic limitations are imposed, but the system fails to provide comprehensive protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidprotection comprehensiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from location-based coverage (geofencing within specific areas) to network-based coverage utilizing mobile networks and internet connectivity. This allows users to receive protection anywhere with network access, adding the dimension of mobility and eliminating geographic boundaries while maintaining comprehensive protection through digital communication infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Loss of time

If traditional emergency services are used, then response times are delayed, but the system becomes less effective for time-critical situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoideffectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Users pre-configure their emergency information, preferred responders, and contact lists before emergencies occur. This preliminary setup eliminates delays during critical moments when users would otherwise need to provide information under stress. The system has already matched users with potential responders in advance, enabling immediate alert transmission and faster response times when emergencies occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240171669A1Universal life saving system
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 APEX TECHLINK INC
  • US20240171669A1 patent drawing
  • US20240171669A1 patent drawing
  • US20240171669A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for alerting a responder by a first component uses a voice recognition module of the first component to receive a verbal command from the person to send an alert, and uses a location module of the first component to identify location information of the person in response to the verbal command. The method also uses a video recorder of the first component to record environment information of the person in response to the verbal command, and uses a predefined communication protocol to send the alert, the location information, and the environment information to a second component through a communications network. The method uses an artificial intelligence module of the second component to analyze the alert, the location information, and the environment information to identify a method to rescue the person. A drone is instructed to rescue the person based on the identified method to rescue the person.