Universal Locking Device for Electrical Installation Housing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical installation devices, such as circuit breakers, require multiple variants of locking devices to accommodate different housing designs, leading to increased development, warehousing, and logistics costs, as well as higher installation efforts due to the need for various shut-off devices and complex assembly processes.

Innovation Solution

A locking arrangement featuring a bracket element with two free ends that fit into latching openings on the device, coupled with a closure element having guide contours for different spacings, allowing the same components to be used across various housing widths, reducing the need for multiple designs and simplifying assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If different locking devices are provided for different housing designs, then the actuating element can be blocked for each specific device design, but the number of parts increases leading to higher development, warehousing, and logistics costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking functionVSAvoidnumber of locking device variants
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is designed with a closure element that can accommodate multiple guide contours for different spacing configurations. This allows a single locking device design to serve multiple housing widths by selecting appropriate guide contours, eliminating the need for separate locking device variants for each housing design while maintaining reliable blocking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The closure element is designed to be displaceable relative to the bracket element, allowing dynamic adjustment between different guide contours. This dynamic capability enables the locking device to adapt to different spacing requirements of various housing designs without requiring multiple static device variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If different locking devices are provided for different housing designs, then each device can be optimized for its specific housing, but the assembly effort increases due to the need to keep and select from various shut-off devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking functionVSAvoidassembly effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Electricians only need to keep one universal locking device design in stock, which can accommodate multiple housing widths through the selection of different guide contours. This universality significantly reduces installation effort by eliminating the need to select from multiple specialized locking device variants during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple variants of locking devices are maintained, then each variant can match specific housing widths, but development, warehousing, and logistics costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing adaptationVSAvoidcost of maintaining variants
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A single locking device design with multiple guide contours replaces multiple specialized locking device variants. This approach maintains precise spacing adaptation for different housing widths while significantly reducing development costs, warehousing requirements, and logistics complexity associated with managing multiple product variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If a single locking device design is used for all housing widths, then the number of parts is reduced, but the device cannot accommodate different spacings between latching openings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of locking device variantsVSAvoidspacing accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closure element's displaceable design enables it to engage with different guide contours corresponding to various spacing configurations. This dynamic adaptability allows a single locking device design to accommodate different spacings between latching openings on various housing widths without compromising versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The closure element incorporates multiple distinct guide contours as separate functional segments within a single component. This segmentation allows the closure element to engage with different bracket element configurations corresponding to various housing widths, providing adaptability without requiring multiple complete locking device variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2239751B1Assembly for blocking an actuation element of an electroinstallation device and electroinstallation device
Publication Date: 2016.01.13 SIEMENS AG
  • EP2239751B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2239751B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2239751B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

The device has a clip element (5) whose free ends (7) are insertable into two latch openings which are spaced apart from each other at a defined distance. A closure element is coupled to the clip element for fixing the free ends of the clip element in the openings during shifting of closure element relative to the clip element to block the actuating element. The closure element has different guiding contours for the clip element, where the contours are provided for different distances of the openings.