Universal Stator Design for High-Efficiency Electric Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric machine stators and rotors with a limited inner to outer diameter ratio (55% or less) restrict the efficiency and versatility of brushless permanent magnet motors, particularly in hermetic applications, as they cannot achieve high full-load efficiency with different magnet materials.

Innovation Solution

A method of manufacturing electric machines using a progressive die to produce stator and rotor laminations with the same inner and outer diameters, allowing for different magnet slot configurations, enabling the use of various magnet materials while maintaining high efficiency, by changing only specific stages of the die press.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the inner to outer diameter ratio of stators is limited to 55% or less, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the full-load efficiency and versatility with different magnet materials cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcompatibility with different magnet materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stator is designed with a universal inner to outer diameter ratio of 60% or greater that can accommodate multiple magnet materials (neodymium, ferrite, samarium cobalt) and different magnet slot configurations. This multi-functional design allows the same stator to achieve high efficiency (≥92.5%) with various rotor types, eliminating the need for multiple stator designs and enabling versatile application across different motor configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the inner to outer diameter ratio is increased to ≥60%, then the full-load efficiency with different magnet materials is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different magnet materialsVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into two independent parts: (1) stator lamination production using a die press with fixed outer diameter and tooth geometry, and (2) rotor lamination production with variable magnet slot configurations. This segmentation allows the stator to be manufactured once with standardized dimensions (ID/OD ≥60%), while only the rotor dies need to be changed for different magnet materials, significantly reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The die press system is designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, where the stator-forming dies remain fixed while only the rotor-forming dies are changed to produce different magnet slot configurations. This dynamic approach maintains manufacturing flexibility for different magnet materials while minimizing the complexity of changing the entire tooling system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If the stator is designed for high efficiency with one magnet material, then the efficiency is optimized for that material, but it cannot achieve high efficiency with other magnet materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull-load efficiencyVSAvoidcompatibility with different magnet materials
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stator is engineered as a universal component with optimized geometry (ID/OD ≥60%, specific tooth width and slot dimensions) that achieves high efficiency (≥92.5% full-load) with multiple magnet materials including neodymium, ferrite, and samarium cobalt. This universal design eliminates the need for material-specific stator designs, allowing the same stator to be paired with different rotors depending on the required efficiency and application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10141801B2Electric machines, stators and compressors and methods of manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 COPELAND SCROLL COMPRESSORS LP
  • US10141801B2 patent drawing
  • US10141801B2 patent drawing
  • US10141801B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing dynamoelectric machines includes producing a first plurality and a second plurality of stator and rotor laminations using a die press, forming a first rotor from the first plurality of rotor laminations, and forming a second rotor from the second plurality of rotor laminations. The first plurality and the second plurality of stator laminations have the same inner and outer diameters. The first plurality and the second plurality of rotor laminations have the same inner and outer diameters. The first plurality of rotor laminations have a first magnet slot configuration and the second plurality of rotor laminations have a second magnet slot configuration different than the first magnet slot configuration. The first rotor and the second rotor may have the same or different stack heights. Preferably, a ratio of each stator lamination's inner diameter to outer diameter is at least 60%.