Universal Tax Engine Decoupling Authorities From Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tax compliance systems are overly complex due to the multitude of taxing authorities and geographical regions, requiring redundant data storage and frequent software updates to accommodate changing tax laws, which complicates transactional tax calculations and reporting.

Innovation Solution

A system that decouples taxing authorities from geographical zones, allowing each authority to operate independently and autonomously, using object-oriented techniques and relational data modeling to handle multiple authorities and zones without data duplication, enabling quick updates to tax laws without software re-releases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tax engines are implemented to handle different taxing authorities, then tax compliance coverage is improved, but system complexity and data redundancy increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetax compliance coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal tax engine that can handle multiple taxing authorities through a standardized interface. The system uses a common data model with tables for authorities, zones, and mappings between them, allowing a single engine to process taxes for any number of jurisdictions. This eliminates the need for separate tax engines for different authorities while maintaining comprehensive tax compliance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If tax laws are updated frequently to accommodate changing regulations, then tax compliance accuracy is improved, but software update frequency and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetax compliance accuracyVSAvoidsoftware update frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic data model where tax laws, rates, and regulations are stored in database tables rather than hard-coded in software. This allows tax authorities to update tax parameters by simply modifying database records without requiring software re-compilation or re-deployment. The system dynamically reads these parameters during tax calculations, enabling rapid adaptation to changing tax laws.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If redundant data is stored to support multiple taxing authorities, then data access speed is improved, but data storage efficiency and maintenance difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata access speedVSAvoiddata storage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the tax data model into distinct tables: authorities table, zones table, and authority-zone mapping table. This normalization eliminates data redundancy by storing each authority and zone only once, with relationships defined through foreign keys. The segmented structure maintains fast data access through efficient database indexing while significantly reducing storage requirements compared to redundant data storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7933803B1Universal tax engine
Publication Date: 2011.04.26 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • US7933803B1 patent drawing
  • US7933803B1 patent drawing
  • US7933803B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This Disclosure relates to a program controlled apparatus, system, and method for determining the transactional taxes due for each item by any taxing authority worldwide. The apparatus comprises a first database comprising a tree structure identifying all of the zones to be examined. A second database comprising all of the taxing authorities is independent from the first zone database. A third database, decoupled from the first and second databases, has data representing the relationship between the data records of the first database and the data records of the second database. Each of the databases can be updated periodically to reflect any changes in identified taxing authorities for the zones over which they may have taxing authority. Furthermore, the present invention provides for an independent, autonomous determination of jurisdiction and tax for each line item and calculates the tax based on any exceptions and exemptions.