Unmanned Vehicle Path Deviation Threshold Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned vehicles face collisions due to lack of geographic information about obstacles and unpredictable environmental conditions, leading to deviations from planned paths, which can result in inefficient path recalculations and potential collisions with other vehicles or obstacles.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system where unmanned vehicles determine their current and planned positions, calculate deviations, and adjust their movement based on predetermined thresholds to decide when to recalculate a new path, thereby reducing unnecessary path recalculations and maintaining efficient navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If unmanned vehicles frequently recalculate paths in response to deviations, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but processing resource consumption increases and system efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of path recalculation frequency by introducing a threshold-based decision mechanism. Instead of recalculating paths frequently or continuously, the system monitors deviation magnitude and only triggers recalculation when deviation exceeds a predetermined threshold, thereby optimizing the balance between collision avoidance and processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the deviation between current position and planned path, comparing it against a threshold, and using this feedback to decide whether to recalculate the path. This closed-loop control ensures recalculation occurs only when necessary, avoiding unnecessary processing while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If unmanned vehicles recalculate paths for minor deviations, then navigation accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of navigation intervention by introducing a threshold for deviation magnitude. Minor deviations below the threshold are allowed to persist without triggering path recalculation, while only significant deviations trigger the time-consuming recalculation process, thereby optimizing the trade-off between navigation accuracy and time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If unmanned vehicles maintain planned paths during minor deviations, then processing resource efficiency is improved, but collision risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing resource efficiencyVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback monitoring of deviation magnitude to decide when to maintain the planned path and when to recalculate. By continuously measuring deviation and comparing it to a threshold, the system ensures that path maintenance (which conserves processing resources) occurs only when it is safe to do so, while triggering recalculation when collision risk becomes significant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If unmanned vehicles in a fleet independently recalculate paths, then individual vehicle adaptability is improved, but coordination difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual vehicle adaptabilityVSAvoidcoordination difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of path adjustment behavior by using a unified threshold parameter across the fleet. Each vehicle independently monitors its own deviation and applies the same threshold-based recalculation logic, which provides individual adaptability while maintaining coordination through parameter consistency across all vehicles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10185321B2Unmanned vehicle, system and method for determining a planned path for unmanned vehicles
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10185321B2 patent drawing
  • US10185321B2 patent drawing
  • US10185321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments are directed to an unmanned vehicle. The unmanned vehicle can include a memory unit that is configured to store a planned path of the unmanned vehicle. The unmanned vehicle can also include a position unit that is configured to determine a current position of the unmanned vehicle, the position unit further configured to determine a planned position of the unmanned vehicle based on the planned path data stored in the memory unit. The unmanned vehicle can further include a control unit disposed in communication with the position unit, the control unit configured to determine a deviation based on the planned position and the current position of the unmanned vehicle, and control a movement of the unmanned vehicle such that the unmanned vehicle moves along the planned path if the deviation is less than a predetermined threshold.