Unmixed Second-Order Derivative Learning Rate Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

First-order optimization algorithms like Gradient Descent for Machine Learning require difficult hyperparameter tunings, particularly learning rate adjustments, which can lead to long training times or instability and nonconvergence, while second-order methods are computationally expensive.

Innovation Solution

A new optimization method that uses estimates of first-order derivatives and non-mixed second-order derivatives to automatically tune learning rates, reducing computational costs and preventing nonconvergence by adjusting learning rates based on unmixed second-order derivative estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If second-order optimization algorithms are used, then convergence speed is improved, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvergence speedVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the Hessian matrix computation by focusing only on diagonal elements (unmixed second-order derivatives) rather than computing the full matrix. This segmentation allows capturing essential curvature information for convergence acceleration while avoiding the O(n²) computational cost of full Hessian computation, resolving the contradiction between convergence speed and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different learning rates for different parameters based on their individual unmixed second-order derivative estimates. Instead of a uniform approach, each parameter receives tailored learning rate adjustment based on its local curvature characteristics, improving convergence speed without proportionally increasing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Use of energy by moving object

If first-order optimization algorithms are used, then computational cost is reduced, but learning rate tuning becomes difficult and training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the optimization algorithm to automatically adjust its own learning rates based on computed unmixed second-order derivative estimates. The system serves itself by deriving adaptive learning rates from the problem's inherent curvature information, eliminating the need for manual hyperparameter tuning and reducing training time without significantly increasing computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters dynamically by adjusting learning rates based on the computed unmixed second-order derivatives. This parameter adaptation allows the algorithm to respond to the problem's local geometry, improving convergence speed while maintaining the computational efficiency of first-order methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If learning rate is set too high, then training time is reduced, but stability deteriorates and nonconvergence occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining timeVSAvoidtraining stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making learning rates adaptive rather than static. Learning rates are dynamically adjusted based on the computed unmixed second-order derivatives, allowing the algorithm to take larger steps when the landscape is smooth and smaller steps when curvature is high, thus reducing training time while maintaining training stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the computed unmixed second-order derivatives to inform learning rate adjustments. This feedback mechanism allows the algorithm to respond to the local geometry of the cost function, preventing instability and nonconvergence while achieving faster training times through appropriate step size selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240362527A1Machine learning using rate adjustment functions of unmixedsecond-order derivative estimates
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 NGUYEN ANTHONY JUSTIN
  • US20240362527A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362527A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362527A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to the field of Machine Learning, more particularly, methods and apparatuses to tune learning rates to accelerate training and avoid non-convergence. The new method utilizes estimates of the first-order derivatives and the unmixed second-order derivatives of the cost function relative to model parameters and a rate adjustment function to update the model parameters iteratively during model training.