Unpredictable Vehicle Navigation via Randomized State Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for controlling air vehicle movement during surveillance missions near a point of interest are inadequate in reducing detectability by hostile forces and fail to adapt to dynamic environmental conditions, leading to increased risk of detection and potential loss.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for automatically controlling vehicle movement in an unpredictable manner by identifying a current state, selecting a next state using a processor unit, and randomly adjusting attributes such as location, altitude, speed, and orientation to minimize repetition and satisfy mission constraints, thereby reducing detectability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current automated navigation systems are used to control air vehicle movement during surveillance missions, then the vehicle can maintain stable flight and complete mission objectives, but the vehicle follows predictable flight paths that increase detectability by hostile forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission completion reliabilityVSAvoiddetectability by hostile forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system dynamically adjusts flight parameters including position, altitude, speed, and orientation by randomly selecting from multiple possible next states. This creates unpredictable, non-repeating flight paths that adapt continuously during the mission, making the vehicle difficult to detect while maintaining reliable mission completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the air vehicle follows a fixed or predetermined flight path to ensure stable operation and meet mission requirements, then operational reliability is maintained, but the predictability of the path increases the risk of detection and attack by hostile forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational stabilityVSAvoiddetectability by hostile forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static predetermined paths to dynamic adaptive navigation. At each decision point, the system randomly selects from multiple valid next states that satisfy mission constraints, creating operationally stable yet unpredictable flight patterns that evade detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The navigation system changes multiple flight parameters simultaneously including position coordinates, altitude, speed, and orientation. By randomly selecting values for these parameters from valid ranges, the system maintains operational stability while creating unpredictable flight behavior that reduces detectability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the air vehicle frequently changes flight parameters to reduce predictability and avoid detection, then detectability by hostile forces decreases, but the complexity of navigation control systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetectability by hostile forcesVSAvoidnavigation control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by randomly selecting from predefined valid ranges for each parameter (position, altitude, speed, orientation) rather than implementing complex optimization algorithms. This approach achieves unpredictable flight paths while keeping the control system relatively simple and computationally efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2680096B1Unpredictable vehicle navigation
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2680096B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2680096B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2680096B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for controlling movement of a vehicle (200). A current state (238) of the vehicle (200) is identified. The current state (238) comprises a current location of the vehicle (200). A next state (240) for the vehicle (200) is selected by a processor unit (1104). The next state (240) comprises a next location for the vehicle (200). A value for an attribute of the next state (240) of the vehicle (200) is randomly selected. The movement of the vehicle (200) is controlled to move the vehicle (200) from the current state (238) to the next state (240).