Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Laboratory Information Management Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern scientific laboratories face challenges in identifying anomalous data due to the complexity of high-dimensional, high-throughput data generated by multiple scientific instruments, which can lead to inconsistent or incorrect data.

Innovation Solution

A method is implemented within a laboratory information management system that uses a combination of univariate and multivariate machine learning models to automatically detect anomalies. The univariate model processes individual results, and the multivariate model processes multiple results to identify abnormal outputs, flagging samples for rejection processing based on anomaly scores exceeding a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If threshold-based techniques are used to detect univariate anomalies, then detection capability for simple anomalies is improved, but complexity increases due to requiring well-defined thresholds for each data type and subject matter expert involvement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically analyzing historical data to establish thresholds and detection rules without requiring manual configuration by subject matter experts. The machine learning model continuously refines its anomaly detection capabilities through unsupervised learning from past laboratory results, enabling the system to serve itself in terms of threshold optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters by learning from historical data patterns. Instead of using fixed pre-defined thresholds, the system adapts its detection criteria based on the actual distribution of laboratory results over time, automatically updating statistical parameters such as mean and standard deviation to reflect current operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If threshold-based techniques are used, then implementation is simplified for univariate data, but multivariate anomaly detection capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoidmultivariate anomaly detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges univariate and multivariate analysis capabilities into a unified machine learning framework. The anomaly detection model simultaneously evaluates individual variables and their relationships, combining the simplicity of univariate threshold checking with the comprehensive power of multivariate pattern recognition to detect complex anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from one-dimensional threshold-based checking to multi-dimensional pattern analysis. By incorporating multiple variables and their interactions into the anomaly detection model, the system gains the ability to detect complex multivariate anomalies while maintaining the computational efficiency of simplified univariate approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If human experts manually analyze high-dimensional test data, then detection accuracy for complex patterns is improved, but productivity decreases due to inability to process high-throughput data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual human analysis with automated machine learning algorithms. The unsupervised learning model processes high-dimensional data automatically, identifying complex multivariate patterns that would be impossible for human experts to detect in high-throughput settings, thereby maintaining high accuracy while dramatically improving processing speed and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Extent of automation

If unsupervised machine learning models are used, then automation level is improved and human judgment is eliminated, but model complexity and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training using historical laboratory data to establish the baseline behavior of scientific instruments. By pre-learning from past results, the model builds its internal understanding of normal operational patterns, which simplifies subsequent real-time anomaly detection and reduces the complexity of ongoing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250116678A1Unsupervised techniques for identifying univariate and multivariate anomalies in scientific instrument results within a laboratory information management system
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 THERMO ELECTRONICS LTD
  • US20250116678A1 patent drawing
  • US20250116678A1 patent drawing
  • US20250116678A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of detecting sample anomalies within a laboratory information management system includes obtaining a first result for a sample, processing the first result via a univariate machine learning model, processing a plurality of results for the sample via a multivariate machine learning model in response to the univariate machine learning model generating a normal output for the first result, and flagging, within the laboratory information management system, the sample for rejection processing in response to the multivariate machine learning model generating an abnormal output for the plurality of samples. The first result represents a first type of result, the univariate machine learning model is trained using unsupervised machine learning, the plurality of results includes the first result, each of the plurality of results represents a different type of result for the sample, and the multivariate machine learning model trained using unsupervised machine learning.