Unsupervised Root Cause Analysis for Machine Failure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine failure monitoring systems are inefficient in identifying root causes promptly, often relying on predetermined rules that ignore vast amounts of collected data, leading to missed or inaccurate determinations, and require specialized operators, resulting in costly downtime and wasted resources.

Innovation Solution

An unsupervised machine learning method and system that analyzes sensory inputs from machines to detect anomalies, generate attribution datasets, and determine root causes of failures, enabling real-time identification and prevention of machine failures without the need for specialized operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If predetermined rules are used for monitoring machine failures, then the system is simple to operate, but it ignores vast amounts of collected data leading to missed or inaccurate determinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically analyzing sensory data to identify failure patterns and generate updated monitoring rules without requiring manual intervention from operators. The machine learning model continuously improves its own monitoring capabilities by learning from historical failure data and sensor readings, enabling the system to adapt to new failure modes while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical rule-based monitoring systems with an intelligent machine learning-based system. Instead of relying on predetermined rules that require manual configuration, the system uses neural networks and other ML algorithms to automatically detect failure patterns, substituting the mechanical approach with an intelligent one that can process vast amounts of sensor data while maintaining ease of operation through automated learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If all collected sensory data is analyzed using machine learning, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex machine learning task into distinct functional modules: data collection from multiple sensors, preprocessing and filtering of sensory inputs, feature extraction, pattern recognition using machine learning models, and failure prediction. This modular architecture allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability and reducing complexity through organized data flow and processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If periodic testing at predetermined intervals is used, then the system is simple to implement, but it results in premature maintenance and wasted resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidwasted materials and expenses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary failure detection by continuously analyzing sensory data and identifying patterns that precede actual machine failures. By detecting early signs of failure through machine learning analysis of sensor readings, the system can predict failures before they occur, enabling maintenance to be performed at the optimal time rather than through premature periodic replacement, thus avoiding wasted materials and expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If specialized operators are required to operate monitoring systems, then measurement precision can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to human error and training requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure analysis accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-learning by automatically analyzing sensory data to identify failure patterns and generate updated monitoring rules without requiring manual intervention from operators. The machine learning model continuously improves its own monitoring capabilities by learning from historical failure data and sensor readings, enabling the system to adapt to new failure modes while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical rule-based monitoring systems with an intelligent machine learning-based system. Instead of relying on predetermined rules that require manual configuration, the system uses neural networks and other ML algorithms to automatically detect failure patterns, substituting the mechanical approach with an intelligent one that can process vast amounts of sensor data while maintaining ease of operation through automated learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11243524B2System and method for unsupervised root cause analysis of machine failures
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US11243524B2 patent drawing
  • US11243524B2 patent drawing
  • US11243524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for unsupervised root cause analysis of machine failures. The method includes analyzing, via at least unsupervised machine learning, a plurality of sensory inputs that are proximate to a machine failure, wherein the output of the unsupervised machine learning includes at least one anomaly; identifying, based on the output at least one anomaly, at least one pattern; generating, based on the at least one pattern and the proximate sensory inputs, an attribution dataset, the attribution dataset including a plurality of the proximate sensory inputs leading to the machine failure; and generating, based on the attribution dataset, at least one analytic, wherein the at least one analytic includes at least one root cause anomaly representing a root cause of the machine failure.