Update Deployment Manager for Controlled Software Rollouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack efficient methods for controlled deployment of software updates across multiple computing devices, often leading to unintended performance issues due to the lack of real-time monitoring and adaptive deployment strategies.

Innovation Solution

An update deployment manager that monitors performance metrics during and after update deployment, allowing for dynamic adjustments such as modifying deployment rates, halting, or rolling back updates based on observed effects, ensuring controlled and optimized update distribution across computing devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If software updates are deployed rapidly across multiple computing devices, then productivity and update distribution speed are improved, but system reliability and performance stability deteriorate due to lack of monitoring and control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate deployment speedVSAvoidsystem performance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by deploying updates to a subset of computing devices before full-scale deployment. This staged approach allows the system to test update compatibility and performance impact on a limited group, then use that data to inform subsequent deployment decisions, thereby maintaining reliability while achieving eventual widespread distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms by monitoring performance metrics of computing devices after update deployment. This feedback loop enables the system to detect performance degradation or errors, automatically adjust deployment strategies, and rollback updates if necessary, thus resolving the contradiction between rapid deployment and system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If update deployment is controlled and monitored closely, then system reliability is improved, but deployment speed and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate deployment controlVSAvoidupdate distribution rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making deployment control adaptive rather than static. Deployment parameters such as rollout rate, target device selection, and monitoring intensity are dynamically adjusted based on real-time performance data. This allows the system to maintain high reliability through continuous adaptation while preserving deployment speed by automating decisions that would otherwise require manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as deployment target selection criteria, rollout speed, and monitoring thresholds based on observed performance metrics. By dynamically modifying these parameters, the system optimizes the balance between control and speed, ensuring reliable deployment without unnecessarily slowing down the distribution process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If performance monitoring is implemented during update deployment, then system stability is improved, but device complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stability during updateVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multi-functionality by designing monitoring components that serve multiple purposes: detecting performance degradation, collecting deployment metrics, identifying affected devices, and providing feedback for deployment decisions. This universal approach reduces overall system complexity by eliminating the need for separate specialized components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system operates autonomously by automatically collecting performance data, analyzing results, and triggering appropriate responses without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability reduces the operational complexity of managing updates while maintaining system stability through continuous automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10248404B2Managing update deployment
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10248404B2 patent drawing
  • US10248404B2 patent drawing
  • US10248404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for managing deployment of an update to computing devices are provided. An update deployment manager determines one or more initial computing devices to receive and execute an update. The update deployment manager further monitors a set of performance metrics with respect to the initial computing devices or a collection of computing devices. The update deployment manager may modify the rate of deployment based on the monitored performance metrics. For example, the update deployment manager may select additional computing devices to receive and execute an update. Further, the update deployment manager may halt deployment of the update. Moreover, the update deployment manager may rollback the deployment of the update.