Consolidating Update Recommendations via Contextual Path Catalogs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information handling systems face challenges in managing updates due to insufficient information in update catalogs, leading to missed critical updates and potential security vulnerabilities, as system administrators lack detailed insights to make informed decisions about update applicability.

Innovation Solution

The system and method involve creating a context-specific update path catalog that provides detailed information about all updates for a component, including criticality levels, and using an algorithm to determine applicable updates based on user-specified or default criteria, allowing for consolidated update recommendations and automated or approved installations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If update catalogs provide only basic update information, then the system remains simple and easy to maintain, but system administrators lack detailed insights to make informed decisions about update applicability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate information completenessVSAvoidupdate catalog complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The update catalog is segmented into multiple structured fields including criticality level, component name, version information, description, and installation requirements. This segmentation allows detailed information to be organized in a manageable manner, providing administrators with comprehensive insights while maintaining system maintainability through standardized data structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary processing layer is introduced between the update source and the administrator interface. This layer processes and enriches basic update information into detailed contextual data, including criticality assessments and applicability determinations, thereby bridging the gap between simple update catalogs and informed decision-making requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system provides detailed update information and criticality levels, then administrators can make informed decisions, but the system becomes more complex and harder to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate decision accuracyVSAvoidupdate management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of update information from basic metadata to enriched contextual data including criticality levels (critical, important, optional), version ranges, and applicability criteria. This parameter transformation enables reliable update decisions while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized parameter definitions and automated processing rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where update information is automatically validated against system state, and criticality levels are dynamically determined based on predefined criteria. This feedback loop ensures reliable update decisions while reducing manual maintenance requirements through automated validation and assessment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If the update catalog includes all possible update details, then administrators have complete information, but the system requires more storage space and processing resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate information completenessVSAvoidsystem processing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The update catalog applies local quality by providing detailed information only where necessary. Criticality levels and detailed descriptions are included for updates that affect system reliability, while less critical updates contain summarized information. This selective detail approach ensures information completeness for important updates while reducing overall storage and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of detail in update information based on the update's criticality and the system's current state. Critical updates receive full detailed information, while optional updates contain condensed data. This dynamic information presentation reduces processing resources for low-priority updates while maintaining completeness for critical ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11880672B2Dynamically consolidating applicable updates into an update recommendation
Publication Date: 2024.01.23 DELL PROD LP
  • US11880672B2 patent drawing
  • US11880672B2 patent drawing
  • US11880672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed for performing, by a processor of an information handling system, an inventory of updateable components of the information handling system. The system and method also includes retrieving an update path catalog for the updateable component and determining published updates between a current version and a target version of the updateable component according to the update path catalog. In addition, the system and method includes determining update recommendations based on the published updates between the current version and the target version. Finally, the system and method includes consolidating the update recommendations into the consolidated update recommendation according to a criterion.