UPF Packet Marking for Selective Protocol Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing user plane functions (UPFs) within complex network architectures, particularly in scenarios involving multiple technologies and releases, leading to suboptimal performance and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a flexible and configurable architecture for user plane functions (UPFs) that can adapt to various criteria, such as device capabilities and traffic loads, allowing selective protocol execution and optimized resource allocation across diverse wireless devices and base stations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed architecture for user plane functions is used, then implementation is simpler, but adaptability to different device capabilities and traffic loads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to device capabilities and traffic loadsVSAvoidarchitecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic protocol execution where the UPF selectively executes protocols based on real-time criteria including device capabilities and traffic load conditions. The architecture transitions from static to dynamic by enabling the UPF to adapt its operational behavior, selecting which protocols to execute and which to skip based on current network conditions and device requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters of the UPF by introducing configurable criteria that determine protocol execution. These parameters include device capability levels, traffic load thresholds, and protocol priority settings that can be adjusted to optimize performance for different scenarios without changing the fundamental architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If all protocols are executed in user plane functions, then compatibility is improved, but processing overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidprotocol processing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary protocol execution from the UPF by implementing selective protocol skipping. Based on evaluated criteria such as device capabilities and traffic conditions, the UPF identifies and excludes protocols that are not needed for specific data units, thereby reducing processing overhead and latency while maintaining compatibility where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by executing only the necessary subset of protocols rather than all protocols uniformly. The UPF performs partial protocol execution tailored to each data unit's requirements, avoiding excessive processing of redundant protocols and optimizing the balance between compatibility and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If user plane functions are optimized for specific scenarios, then performance in those scenarios improves, but versatility across different wireless technologies deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidcompatibility across wireless technologies
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal UPF architecture capable of handling multiple wireless technologies and scenarios through configurable criteria. The same UPF can be adapted to optimize for different technologies (4G, 5G, etc.) and scenarios (eMBB, URLLC, mMTC) by adjusting the execution criteria without requiring separate specialized implementations, thereby achieving multi-functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the protocol execution decision-making process into evaluable criteria that can be independently configured for different scenarios. By dividing the optimization problem into separable criteria (device capabilities, traffic load, protocol priorities), the system can selectively apply different criterion combinations for different wireless technologies while maintaining a unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4342254B1Data unit in wireless system
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 OFINNO LLC
  • EP4342254B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4342254B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D
  • EP4342254B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A user plane function (UPF) sends, to an access node, a general packet radio service tunneling protocol (GTP) container comprising a first packet and a GTP header comprising a field indicating that the first packet is one of one or more packets associated with a first data unit of a data flow.