Upflow Reactor Gas Distributor for Hydrogenation Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Upflow reactors used in hydroconversion of heavy oils have limited hydrogenation capacity due to low gas-liquid contact surface, which restricts the conversion of heavy oils to light hydrocarbons (350° C.−), and increasing this capacity without raising gas holdup is challenging.

Innovation Solution

Equipping the reactor with a gas distributor having at least 100 orifices per m2 and feeding hydrogen at a surface velocity that causes bubble packing, maximizing the gas-liquid unit surface without exceeding a gas holdup of 0.33, thereby increasing hydrogenation capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If hydrogen is fed by simple bubbling in conventional upflow reactors, then the reactor operation is simple, but the gas-liquid contact surface is low resulting in limited hydrogenation capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation capacityVSAvoidgas distribution system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gas distribution system is segmented into multiple distributors with numerous small orifices (at least 100 per m²) arranged in series along the reactor height. This segmentation of the hydrogen feed into many small streams creates extensive gas-liquid contact surface area while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular distributor units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution transitions from simple bottom-fed bubbling to a multi-dimensional gas distribution approach where hydrogen is introduced at multiple heights and locations through series-arranged distributors. This spatial distribution across multiple dimensions maximizes contact surface area without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the gas holdup is raised to increase the specific gas-liquid surface, then the hydrogenation capacity increases, but the volume of reaction liquid in the reactor decreases reducing cracking capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation capacityVSAvoidreaction liquid volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the reactor are assigned different functions: upper regions with gas distributors focus on hydrogenation (high gas-liquid contact), while lower regions maintain larger liquid volume for cracking reactions. This local differentiation allows simultaneous optimization of both hydrogenation capacity and cracking capacity without compromising either function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor is functionally segmented into zones with different gas holdup levels and liquid volumes. By distributing gas injection points throughout the reactor height rather than concentrating them at the bottom, the system creates localized hydrogenation zones without globally reducing the reaction liquid volume needed for cracking capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the specific gas-liquid surface is increased through high gas holdup, then the hydrogenation capacity increases, but the liquid filling of the reactor decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogenation capacityVSAvoidliquid filling volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gas distribution system utilizes the vertical dimension by placing multiple distributors at different heights along the reactor axis. This vertical distribution creates extensive gas-liquid contact surface area without requiring high gas holdup throughout the entire reactor volume, thereby preserving liquid filling while achieving high hydrogenation capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the complete hydroconversion of heavy oils to light hydrocarbons (350° C.−), resulting in a higher weight average hydrogen content in conversion products, suitable for petrochemical feedstocks, while maintaining optimal liquid filling and cracking capacity.

Implementation Method 1

increase the gas-liquid contact surface through which the hydrogen must diffuse in order to feed all the reactions that a hydroconversion process requires

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

feeding hydrogen at a surface velocity such as to cause the packing of the gas bubbles, whatever density of orifices the gas distributor used has

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBubble packing: Bubble

Data Source

PatentUS20240336851A1Hydrotreatment upflow reactors with high hydrogen-hydrocarbon liquid contact surface and improved hydro-genation capacity
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 PATRON LUIGI
  • US20240336851A1 patent drawing
  • US20240336851A1 patent drawing
  • US20240336851A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a process in which the jump in hydrogenation capacity, necessary to hydroconvert heavy oils totally to light hydrocarbons (350° C.−), is obtained by using an upflow reactor equipped with a gas distributor having a high density of orifices, which is capable of causing the packing of the gas bubbles, this being the most advantageous fluid dynamic condition. The resulting conversion products are suitable as petrochemical feedstocks.