Uphole Milling BHA Debris Bridge Detection and Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During uphole milling, debris cuttings often bridge the borehole near the mill location, affecting milling efficiency and cement placement, leading to incomplete well sealing.

Innovation Solution

A bottom hole assembly with real-time sensing equipment to detect debris bridge location and density, and a secondary downhole mill to grind out the bridge, allowing for continuous milling and effective cement placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uphole milling is performed to remove casing and cement, then casing removal efficiency is improved, but debris bridges form in the rat hole causing milling interruption and cement placement failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing removal efficiencyVSAvoidmilling continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of debris bridges using sensors (acoustic, vibration, pressure, or optical) before the bridges become severe enough to stop milling operations. This early detection allows proactive intervention by lowering the secondary mill to break up detected bridges, maintaining continuous milling operations and preventing interruptions that would compromise reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback through continuous monitoring of milling parameters (power consumption, vibration, acoustic signals, pressure differential) to detect debris bridge formation. When bridge conditions are detected, the system automatically triggers intervention by deploying the secondary mill to break up the bridge, then resuming primary mill operations, thereby maintaining continuous productive operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time monitoring of debris bridge is implemented, then milling continuity is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional sensing equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling continuityVSAvoidsensing equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system uses multi-functional sensors that can detect multiple parameters simultaneously (acoustic signals, vibration patterns, pressure differentials) to identify debris bridge conditions. This approach consolidates multiple detection capabilities into integrated sensing packages, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliable debris bridge detection and milling continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs sensors that leverage the natural physical phenomena occurring during milling operations (acoustic emissions from cutting, vibration patterns, pressure changes in circulating fluid) to detect debris bridges without requiring external monitoring equipment. The milling process itself generates the signals needed for detection, eliminating the need for separate complex monitoring systems while ensuring milling continuity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If secondary mill is used to remove debris bridge, then milling continuity is improved, but device complexity increases due to dual mill configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling continuityVSAvoiddual mill configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The milling system is divided into two functional segments: a primary mill for routine casing removal operations and a secondary mill specifically dedicated to debris bridge removal. This segmentation allows each mill to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall system simplicity. The secondary mill is integrated into the same BHA, sharing common support structures and control systems, which reduces the complexity increase that would result from having separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between primary and secondary mill operations based on real-time debris bridge detection. The secondary mill is deployed only when needed to break up detected bridges, then retracted or disengaged to resume primary mill operations. This dynamic operation mode allows the system to maintain high productivity through continuous milling while keeping the dual-mill configuration manageable by activating only the necessary component at any given time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10267112B2Debris bridge monitoring and removal for uphole milling system
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US10267112B2 patent drawing
  • US10267112B2 patent drawing
  • US10267112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bottom hole assembly (BHA) contains a motor and a section mill for milling in an uphole direction after blade extension with circulating fluid through the BHA. Below the section mill is sensing equipment to detect location of a bridge formed by the cuttings or swarf from the section mill. A secondary mill oriented for cutting in a downhole direction is located at the bottom of the BHA for use in removal of the bridge. The sensing equipment delivers in real time data as to the density of the bridge so that decisions to interrupt the section milling and to lower the secondary mill to the bridge can be made in real time. Cement is pumped and displaced by a wiper plug to plug and abandon the hole.