Uplink Auto-Grant Scheduling for Cellular Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods to reduce uplink latency in 4G and 5G radio access networks are inefficient due to unreliable data prediction and wasteful proactive grants, as they often allocate resources to UEs without actual traffic, leading to increased latency and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method where uplink grants are sent only to zero-buffer UEs after serving active UEs with non-zero buffers, ensuring available resources are utilized efficiently by prioritizing higher priority traffic and using remaining resources for zero-buffer UEs, with scheduling managed through Physical Downlink Control Channel and Physical Uplink Shared Channel resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If proactive grants are sent to all UEs to reduce uplink latency, then uplink latency is reduced, but resource wastage increases due to grants allocated to UEs without actual traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink latencyVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating grant allocation based on UE buffer status. Zero-buffer UEs receive grants only when resources remain after serving active UEs, while active UEs with non-zero buffers are served first. This localized differentiation optimizes resource allocation efficiency while reducing uplink latency for UEs that actually need transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the scheduling parameter priority based on buffer status. By introducing a parameter change where zero-buffer UEs are scheduled only after active UEs and when resources remain, the system dynamically adjusts grant allocation behavior to balance latency reduction with resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If prediction methods are used to send grants to UEs with anticipated data, then uplink latency is reduced, but reliability decreases due to unreliable traffic characteristic prediction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink latencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively allocating resources to zero-buffer UEs in advance, before they generate traffic. This allows UEs to immediately transmit data when it arrives in the buffer, reducing uplink latency without relying on unreliable prediction of when traffic will occur. The grant is prepared ahead of time but only activated when resources remain after serving active UEs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If resources are allocated to zero-buffer UEs before active UEs, then resource allocation simplicity increases, but productivity decreases due to wasted resources on UEs without traffic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the UE population into two distinct groups: active UEs with non-zero buffers and zero-buffer UEs. This segmentation enables differentiated scheduling where active UEs are served first to ensure resource utilization efficiency, while zero-buffer UEs receive grants only from remaining resources. The segmentation maintains operational simplicity through clear priority rules while improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4462923A1A method to reduce uplink over-the-air latency in cellular systems
Publication Date: 2024.11.13 MAVENIR SYST INC
  • EP4462923A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4462923A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4462923A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of operating a wireless cellular communication system includes: operating one of an eNB or gNB communicating with a set of user equipments (UEs); and scheduling, using a scheduler, uplink (UL) auto-grants to the set of the UEs when selected resources are available, the selected resources including Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) resource, Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) resource and scheduler capacity. The scheduler determines at least two UEs in RRC-connected mode and having zero UL buffer count, at least one of the two UEs with downlink (DL) traffic present and at least one of the two UEs without DL traffic present. The scheduler selects a set of RRC-connected UEs with zero UL buffer count for which UL auto-grants can be scheduled with a designated number of physical resource blocks (PRBs) and designated Modulation and Coding Scheme (MCS).