Uplink Buffer Status Reporting Grouping for Wireless Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless telecommunication systems face inefficiencies in uplink scheduling due to high signaling overhead and inability to differentiate service priorities, particularly in reporting buffer size, latency, and packet loss information, which affects resource allocation and QoS-aware scheduling.

Innovation Solution

A method where user equipment computes and reports group-related information on service data amounts and emergency indications, allowing base stations to allocate resources efficiently while minimizing signaling overhead by using flexible trigger mechanisms and differentiated priority reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If buffer status report includes all service streams with fixed format, then sufficient scheduling information is provided, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling information completenessVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the buffer status report by dividing service streams into different priority groups (first priority, second priority, etc.). Instead of reporting all service streams uniformly, the UE selectively reports buffer status information for specific priority groups based on triggering conditions. This segmentation allows the system to provide sufficient scheduling information for high-priority services while reducing overall signaling overhead by omitting low-priority services when resources are constrained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial reporting by introducing triggering mechanisms that determine whether buffer status information should be reported. The UE monitors buffer status and only triggers reports when specific conditions are met (e.g., buffer threshold exceeded, latency requirement violated). This partial action approach ensures that scheduling information is provided when necessary while avoiding excessive signaling when buffer status is already satisfactory or resources are limited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Adaptability or versatility

If reporting method differentiates service priority, then QoS-aware scheduling is supported, but reporting mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS differentiation capabilityVSAvoidreporting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments service streams into distinct priority groups (first priority service streams, second priority service streams, etc.) and assigns different reporting treatments to each segment. The buffer status report structure is segmented to include separate buffer size indications for different priority groups. This segmentation enables QoS-aware scheduling by allowing the base station to differentiate resource allocation based on service priority while maintaining a relatively simple reporting structure that follows existing protocol formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enhances the existing buffer status report mechanism to serve multiple functions: it simultaneously provides buffer size information, service priority differentiation, and triggering condition indicators within a unified reporting framework. The same reporting structure can accommodate different priority levels and triggering scenarios without requiring separate reporting mechanisms for each case, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining QoS differentiation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If latency information is reported, then scheduling efficiency increases, but report overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling efficiencyVSAvoidreport overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements selective latency reporting by introducing triggering mechanisms that determine when latency information should be included in the buffer status report. Latency information is reported partially - only when specific triggering conditions are met (e.g., when buffer status indicates potential latency violation, or when explicitly requested by the base station). This partial reporting approach provides latency information to improve scheduling efficiency while avoiding excessive report overhead by omitting latency data when it is not critical for scheduling decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8121083B2Method and device for reporting request for uplink scheduling or emergency in wireless network
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US8121083B2 patent drawing
  • US8121083B2 patent drawing
  • US8121083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The object of the present invention is to provide a reporting strategy for uplink scheduling request information in wireless telecommunication network. Above all, a method for the user equipment to report the uplink scheduling request information to the base station in wireless telecommunication network is disclosed. Firstly, the user equipment computes the overall service data amount of all radio bearers in each group of radio bearers in the buffer of the user equipment; then the user equipment only reports group-related information of triggered one or more groups of radio bearers to the base station. The present invention further proposes a method in the user equipment in wireless telecommunication network for reporting the emergency information to the base station, that is, the user equipment judges whether each radio bearer is in the emergency, and when one or more radio bearers are in the emergency, the user equipment sends emergency indication information to the base station. By the combination of the two reporting method, the base station can realize efficient and fair scheduling.