Adaptive Uplink Feedback Signaling for LTE Symbol Space Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In LTE UL systems, efficiently allocating physical resources between data and control channels is challenging due to limitations in power control, modulation, and coding schemes, which affect the quality of service and reliability of control signaling, especially at the cell edge and during rapid propagation environment changes.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamically selecting the symbol space and transport format for data-non-associated uplink feedback control signaling, allowing for flexible and efficient adjustment of resources to meet different performance requirements, including using dynamic TFCI signaling to optimize BLER and SINR for both control and data channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If power offset method is used to allocate resources between data and control channels, then resource allocation is simplified, but the quality of service for control signals becomes suboptimal, especially at cell edge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoidcontrol signal quality of service
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static power offset to dynamic symbol space selection. The symbol space for control signaling is dynamically adjusted based on current channel conditions and QoS requirements, allowing the system to adapt to varying propagation environments and maintain optimal control signal quality while simplifying resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter from fixed power offset to variable symbol space allocation. By dynamically selecting the symbol space size for control signaling based on SINR and QoS requirements, the system achieves both simplified allocation and optimal quality of service across different operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed symbol space allocation is used for control signaling, then resource allocation is straightforward, but resource utilization becomes inefficient in varying propagation environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation straightforwardnessVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the symbol space allocation for control signaling based on current propagation conditions and QoS requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows efficient resource utilization across varying environments while maintaining straightforward allocation through standardized selection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying the symbol space size for control signaling according to channel conditions. This enables the system to optimize resource utilization efficiency while keeping the allocation process straightforward through predefined selection criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If dynamic adjustment of symbol space and power allocation is implemented, then resource utilization efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent focuses on parameter changes in symbol space allocation rather than complex power control mechanisms. This approach achieves improved resource utilization efficiency while limiting the increase in system complexity to primarily selection and adaptation functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If control signaling adapts to data channel SINR target, then resource allocation is optimized, but control signal delay requirements are harder to meet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation optimizationVSAvoidcontrol signal transmission speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects symbol space sizes that balance resource allocation optimization with delay requirements. By adapting the symbol space allocation in real-time based on channel conditions and QoS needs, the system achieves both optimized resource utilization and meeting of control signal timing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20090033524A1Adaptive transport format uplink signaling for data-non-associated feedback control signals
Publication Date: 2009.02.05 BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO LTD
  • US20090033524A1 patent drawing
  • US20090033524A1 patent drawing
  • US20090033524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more dynamically selected signaling bits are added in a downlink from a base station to user equipment (UE) so that the UE can use an adaptive “symbol space” for uplink feedback (CQI/HARQ) signaling and know from the extra added downlink signaling bits and the MCS currently signaled in parallel how big a symbol space to use at the moment for the uplink feedback.