Uplink Grant Handling via HARQ Process Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the LTE wireless communication system, contention between user equipment (UE) during random access procedures leads to misuse of uplink grants, causing collisions and inefficient use of radio resources, as contention losers continue to use the same Temporary C-RNTI to monitor PDCCH, potentially receiving and misusing uplink grants intended for contention winners.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for handling uplink grants in a UE, where a Temporary C-RNTI is set to a value assigned in a Random Access Response message, and the UE monitors a Contention Resolution message to determine if the uplink grant corresponds to a different HARQ Process or has a different Transport Block size than initially provided, preventing data transmission when mismatches are detected to avoid misusing uplink grants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the UE continues to use the Temporary C-RNTI to monitor PDCCH after receiving an uplink grant, then the UE can receive downlink control information, but the UE may misuse the uplink grant for transmission causing collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink transmission successVSAvoidcollision caused by misuse of uplink grant
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the UE monitors the Contention Resolution message and compares the HARQ process number and Transport Block size from the received uplink grant with the expected values. If mismatches are detected, the UE generates a feedback indication to discard the uplink grant, preventing misuse while maintaining reliable communication for legitimate grants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary verification of the uplink grant parameters (HARQ process number and Transport Block size) against the expected values before the UE actually transmits data. This preliminary action prevents the harmful effect of using incorrect uplink grants for transmission, thereby avoiding collisions with other UEs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the UE monitors PDCCH for uplink grants during random access procedure, then the UE can receive downlink control information, but contention losers may receive and misuse uplink grants intended for contention winners

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE ability to receive downlink control informationVSAvoidradio resource waste due to grant misuse
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the Contention Resolution message as a feedback mechanism that provides verification information about the uplink grant parameters. The UE compares the received HARQ process number and Transport Block size with the expected values, and only uses the uplink grant if the parameters match, thereby preventing resource waste while maintaining the ability to receive downlink control information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the verification parameters from simply checking C-RNTI match to also verifying HARQ process number and Transport Block size. This parameter expansion ensures that even if a contention loser receives the same C-RNTI, it cannot misuse the uplink grant because the additional parameter verification will fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If multiple UEs use the same Random Access Preamble, then the random access procedure can be simplified, but contention occurs causing inefficient use of radio resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access procedure complexityVSAvoidradio resource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through the Contention Resolution message that provides verification information about the uplink grant parameters. The UE compares the received HARQ process number and Transport Block size with the expected values, and only uses the uplink grant if the parameters match, thereby preventing resource waste while maintaining the ability to receive downlink control information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the verification function from the basic random access procedure by introducing separate verification steps that check HARQ process number and Transport Block size against expected values. This extraction allows the system to maintain simple random access procedures while adding a verification layer that prevents contention losers from misusing uplink grants, thereby improving radio resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2152045B1Methods and apparatus for handling uplink grant
Publication Date: 2016.10.12 INNOVATIVE SONIC LTD
  • EP2152045B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2152045B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2152045B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for handling an uplink grant received on a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) in a user equipment (UE) of a wireless communication system is disclosed. The method includes steps of setting a Temporary Cell Radio Network Temporary Identifier (Temporary C-RNTI) of the UE to a value assigned in a Random Access Response message, monitoring a contention resolution message, receiving an uplink grant on PDCCH addressed to the Temporary C-RNTI, and not using the uplink grant to transmit data if the uplink grant corresponds to a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Process different from an HARQ Process used for transmission of a Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) in a Message 3 buffer.