Uplink Power Control for Multi-Antenna Terminals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Some terminals in communication systems cannot reach maximum uplink transmission power during multi-antenna transmission, leading to reduced coverage and increased costs due to inefficient power scaling methods.

Innovation Solution

An uplink power control method that maintains the transmission power unchanged under specific precoding indications, allowing terminals with non-coherent or partial coherent transmission capabilities to achieve maximum power and improve coverage without requiring all antennas to reach maximum output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uplink transmission power is scaled according to the proportion of non-zero PUSCH transmission ports to total configured ports, then implementation cost is reduced, but maximum transmission power cannot be reached during low-rank transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation costVSAvoidmaximum transmission power
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic power scaling behavior that adapts to different transmission scenarios. When codebook-based transmission with full coherent capability is detected, no power scaling is applied (scaling factor = 1). For other scenarios, power scaling according to antenna port proportion is applied. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing maximum power when needed while reducing cost in other cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power scaling parameter based on transmission mode and terminal capability. The scaling factor is set to 1 for codebook-based full coherent transmission, and to the proportion of non-zero ports for other cases. This parameter change enables the system to achieve maximum transmission power when required while maintaining cost efficiency in other operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If power scaling is applied according to antenna port proportion, then terminals with limited coherent transmission capability can operate, but coverage is reduced due to inability to reach maximum power at low ranks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different coherent transmission capabilitiesVSAvoidcoverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power scaling that adapts to the terminal's coherent transmission capability and transmission mode. Terminals with full coherent capability using codebook-based transmission receive full power (scaling factor = 1), while other terminals/scenarios apply proportional scaling. This ensures compatibility across different terminal types while maximizing coverage for capable terminals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different power scaling qualities to different transmission scenarios. Codebook-based full coherent transmission receives full power quality, while other scenarios receive scaled power quality. This local differentiation ensures that terminals capable of reaching maximum power actually do so, improving coverage, while other terminals operate within their capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Power

If all antennas are required to reach maximum output power, then maximum transmission power is achieved, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum transmission powerVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic power allocation that requires maximum power only when the terminal has full coherent capability and uses codebook-based transmission. In other cases, power is scaled according to the proportion of active antenna ports. This dynamic requirement reduces implementation cost while maintaining maximum power capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power allocation parameter based on terminal capability and transmission mode. The scaling factor is set to 1 only for codebook-based full coherent transmission, and to the proportion of non-zero ports otherwise. This parameter change reduces the requirement for all antennas to reach maximum power, lowering implementation cost while preserving maximum power capability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3793274B1Uplink power control method, terminal and network device
Publication Date: 2023.03.29 DATANG MOBILE COMM EQUIP CO LTD
  • EP3793274B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3793274B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3793274B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An uplink power control method, a terminal, and a network device are provided, which relates to the field of communications, and is to solve a problem that the terminal cannot reach a maximum transmission power for codebook-based or non-codebook-based uplink multi-antenna transmission in related technologies. The method includes: obtaining an uplink precoding indication; and controlling a value of an uplink transmission power determined according to a power control procedure to remain unchanged, in a case that the uplink precoding indication corresponds to a target precoding indication. Based on the solution of the present disclosure, it is ensured that the maximum uplink transmission power can be reached under part of precoding indications, the coverage of uplink transmission can be improved, and it is not required that all antennas of the terminal can reach the maximum transmission power, thereby reducing the cost.