Uplink Power Management and Distributed Scheduling for Wireless Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in managing power and scheduling for uplink transmissions, leading to excessive inter-sector interference, unfair data rate distribution, and reduced throughput due to unreliable carrier-to-interference ratio estimation.

Innovation Solution

A power management and distributed scheduling scheme that limits transmission power for mobile devices to prevent excessive interference, allowing for dynamic data rate utilization and accurate interference estimation, thereby enabling fair and efficient Quality of Service support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If higher power uplink transmissions are used to increase data rate, then data rate is improved, but inter-sector interference increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidinter-sector interference
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power control where transmission power is adjusted based on real-time channel conditions and interference levels. The system dynamically selects modulation and coding schemes (AMCS) that adapt to current network conditions, allowing mobiles to use higher power when needed while avoiding excessive interference through intelligent power management algorithms that consider both data rate requirements and interference impact on neighboring sectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously including power level, modulation scheme, and coding rate based on channel conditions. By varying these parameters dynamically, the system achieves higher data rates when channel conditions permit while controlling interference through coordinated parameter adjustment across multiple mobiles in a sector.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If time division multiplexing is used to stagger transmissions, then inter-sector interference is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-sector interferenceVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a distributed scheduling approach where each mobile device autonomously determines its transmission timing and power level based on local channel conditions and received control information. The base station provides guidance through control channels, but individual mobiles make scheduling decisions independently, eliminating the need for complex centralized coordination while still achieving interference control through distributed time-slot allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a fixed ROT target is used for all base stations, then simplicity is maintained, but fairness in uplink transmissions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management simplicityVSAvoidtransmission fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a uniform fixed ROT target to location-specific and condition-specific power targets. Each mobile receives customized power control instructions based on its geographic location, channel conditions, and the current state of neighboring sectors. This localizes the quality of service parameters to match actual network conditions, achieving fairness while maintaining manageable complexity through distributed decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If large interference margin is used to avoid channel errors, then reliability is improved, but capacity of uplink and downlink decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel error avoidanceVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic interference margin adjustment where the margin is not fixed but varies based on real-time channel conditions, signal-to-interference ratio, and network load. When channel conditions are favorable and interference is low, the system uses smaller margins to maximize capacity. When conditions deteriorate, the margin increases automatically to maintain reliability, thus optimizing the trade-off between these two parameters throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7412254B2Power management and distributed scheduling for uplink transmissions in wireless systems
Publication Date: 2008.08.12 APPLE INC
  • US7412254B2 patent drawing
  • US7412254B2 patent drawing
  • US7412254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To schedule uplink transmission time slots for a collection of mobile. communication devices, a set of base station target interference patterns is associated with base stations. A time slot target interference pattern is assigned for each time slot and it repeats after several time slots. The time slot target interference pattern in a given time slot specifies the interference allowed by each time slot to a given base station by any single mobile. A priority index may be determined for each time slot for each mobile associated with the particular base station. The priority index may be based, in part, on a determined correlation between the time-slot target interference patterns and a potential interference profile of a mobile to which a time slot is to be allocated. A mobile's throughput requirement, the throughput already received over a specified past duration, the system fairness requirement, as well as the amount of data available for transmission are also used for evaluating the priority index.