Uplink Power Restricted Handover Decision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional handover decisions in wireless communication systems are based solely on downlink reference signals, which can lead to coverage and capacity issues due to power limitations in uplink channels, especially when user equipment (UE) antennas are restricted by Maximum Power Reduction (MPR) requirements, potentially resulting in suboptimal handover decisions.

Innovation Solution

The UE determines handover conditions by considering both downlink and uplink link budgets, triggering or inhibiting handovers based on the relative performance of uplink channels to ensure optimal network switching, even when downlink performance is comparable or better.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If handover decisions are based solely on downlink reference signals, then the handover process is simple and fast, but coverage and capacity issues arise due to uplink power limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover decision speedVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the handover decision process into two independent evaluations: downlink channel quality assessment and uplink link budget evaluation. This allows the system to separately assess downlink performance (for speed) and uplink capability (for reliability), then combine both criteria before making the final handover decision, thus resolving the contradiction between fast decision-making and communication quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to handover decision-making by introducing uplink link budget evaluation as a separate criterion alongside downlink reference signal measurements. This multi-dimensional approach ensures that both downlink performance and uplink power capabilities are considered, preventing handovers to cells that would cause uplink coverage holes while maintaining efficient decision-making processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If MPR restrictions are applied to UE antennas, then RF exposure regulations are met, but uplink power is reduced causing coverage holes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRF exposureVSAvoiduplink coverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary uplink link budget evaluation before executing handover decisions. By assessing the uplink power capability and predicting potential coverage holes in advance, the system can prevent handovers that would result in uplink coverage degradation, thus maintaining both RF exposure compliance and adequate coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the UE reports uplink power capability and power reduction information to the network. This feedback enables the network to make informed handover decisions that account for MPR restrictions, ensuring that handovers do not create uplink coverage holes while still meeting RF exposure requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Illumination intensity

If handover is triggered based on downlink signal strength, then the UE can connect to stronger downlink cells, but uplink capacity may be insufficient due to power restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownlink signal strengthVSAvoiduplink transmit power
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates downlink signal strength evaluation from uplink power capability assessment into distinct evaluation steps. The system first evaluates downlink quality, then independently assesses uplink link budget and power availability, and only combines both positive outcomes for handover execution. This segmentation ensures that strong downlink signals alone do not trigger handovers when uplink power would be insufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the decision parameters by introducing uplink power capability and link budget metrics as additional criteria alongside downlink signal strength. This multi-parameter approach ensures that handovers are triggered only when both downlink quality and uplink power availability meet required thresholds, balancing downlink signal strength with uplink capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11671885B2Restriction based handover
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11671885B2 patent drawing
  • US11671885B2 patent drawing
  • US11671885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Performing restricted based handover. In one aspect, there is a method performed by a user equipment (UE) served by a serving network node. The method comprises determining that a handover condition exists, wherein the handover condition is a handover triggering condition or a handover inhibiting condition. The method further comprises as a result of determining that the handover triggering condition exists, triggering a handover of the UE from the serving network node to a target network node, or as a result of determining that the handover inhibiting condition exists, inhibiting a handover of the UE from the serving network node to the target network node. Determining that the handover condition exists comprises: determining that a power restriction exists i) for an UL channel between the UE and the serving network node or ii) for an UL channel between the UE and the target network node.