Uplink Power Sharing Control for Concurrent Small Cell Transmissions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication networks, the deployment of small cells to offload data traffic from macro cells faces challenges in managing concurrent uplink transmissions, particularly in scenarios where the total uplink transmit power exceeds thresholds due to high latency in backhaul links and independent scheduling by multiple wireless access network nodes, leading to difficulties in detecting dropped or reduced control signals.

Innovation Solution

Implementing uplink transmit power sharing control mechanisms, including prioritization rules and power scaling techniques, to manage concurrent uplink transmissions across multiple wireless access network nodes, ensuring that the total uplink power does not exceed specified thresholds by adjusting the power of lower-priority transmissions and dropping or scaling them as necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If small cells are deployed to offload data traffic from macro cells, then data communication capacity is increased, but management of concurrent uplink transmissions becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata communication capacityVSAvoidconcurrent uplink transmission management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the uplink transmission management into separate components: a macro cell scheduler handles macro cell transmissions while a small cell scheduler handles small cell transmissions. Each scheduler operates independently but coordinates through prioritization rules, dividing the complex management task into manageable segments that can be handled by individual network nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces prioritization rules as an intermediary mechanism between multiple independent schedulers. These rules act as a mediator that resolves conflicts when total uplink power exceeds thresholds, enabling coordination between macro and small cell schedulers without requiring direct complex interaction between them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If independent scheduling is used by multiple wireless access network nodes, then scheduling flexibility is improved, but detection of dropped or reduced control signals becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoiddropped or reduced control signals
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where network nodes monitor total uplink power levels and detect when power thresholds are exceeded. This feedback allows the system to identify when control signals have been dropped or reduced due to power sharing requirements, enabling the independent schedulers to adjust their operations accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical coordination between schedulers with a power-based detection mechanism. Instead of requiring complex signaling protocols to coordinate between independent schedulers, the system uses power level monitoring to infer when conflicts occur and control signals are affected, simplifying the detection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If total uplink power threshold is enforced, then power management reliability is improved, but transmission power of lower-priority signals is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission power of lower-priority signals
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial power reduction to lower-priority signals when total uplink power exceeds thresholds. Instead of reducing all signals uniformly, the system selectively applies power reduction only to lower-priority transmissions while maintaining full power for higher-priority signals, achieving power management reliability without excessive impact on overall transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different power management strategies to different types of signals based on their priority. Higher-priority control signals maintain full transmission power while lower-priority signals undergo power reduction. This local differentiation ensures that critical signaling functions remain reliable while still enforcing overall power management requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240196338A1Uplink power sharing control
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD
  • US20240196338A1 patent drawing
  • US20240196338A1 patent drawing
  • US20240196338A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment detects that an aggregate of calculated uplink transmit power of the UE exceeds a threshold. In response to the detecting, a power of at least one of a plurality of frequency-division multiplexing (FDM)-based uplink transmissions of the UE over corresponding wireless connections with respective wireless access network nodes is adjusted.