Uplink Random Access Repetition for Low-Latency 5G Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless communication systems struggle to meet coverage requirements for low-latency and high-reliability uplink transmission in 5G scenarios, particularly in Type-1 and Type-2 random access procedures, necessitating enhancements in repetitive transmission methods.

Innovation Solution

The system determines the type and number of repetitive transmissions for uplink messages based on random access parameters, allowing for enhanced random access messages to be sent, thereby improving coverage and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional uplink transmission methods are used, then system complexity remains low, but coverage and reliability requirements for low-latency services cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage and reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of repetitive transmission types (first type or second type) and dynamic determination of the number of repetitive transmissions based on random access related parameters. This allows the system to adapt transmission characteristics to specific service requirements, achieving high reliability for low-latency services while maintaining flexibility to use simpler methods when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key transmission parameters including the type of repetitive transmission (first type with different timing relationships versus second type with repeated slots), the number of repetitive transmissions, and the association between uplink messages and downlink messages. These parameter variations enable the system to meet diverse coverage and reliability requirements without requiring fundamentally different system architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If repetitive transmission is increased to improve coverage, then transmission reliability improves, but transmission latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines the number of repetitive transmissions based on random access related parameters, allowing optimization of the balance between reliability and latency. For services requiring low latency, the system can select fewer repetitions with optimized timing, while for services requiring high reliability, more repetitions are allocated. This dynamic adaptation prevents fixed repetitive transmission schemes from causing unnecessary latency delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the uplink transmission into different types of repetitive transmissions (first type and second type) with distinct characteristics. The first type allows flexible timing relationships between messages, while the second type uses repeated slots. This segmentation enables selective application of different repetition strategies for different parts of the transmission process, optimizing the reliability-latency tradeoff for each segment based on service requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If random access related parameters are used to determine transmission characteristics, then transmission optimization improves, but determination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission optimizationVSAvoiddetermination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal autonomously determines the type and number of repetitive transmissions by evaluating random access related parameters itself, without requiring complex network-side control or coordination. This self-service approach simplifies the overall system architecture by distributing the determination logic to the terminal, which can make real-time decisions based on current transmission conditions and service requirements, achieving optimization without centralizing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12537625B2System and method for enhancing an uplink transmission message
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 ZTE CORP
  • US12537625B2 patent drawing
  • US12537625B2 patent drawing
  • US12537625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for wireless communication are disclosed herein. The system and method are configured to determine a first type of repetitive transmission based on one or more random access related parameters, and send a random access message according to the first type. The system and method are configured to determine a first number of repetitive transmission based on one or more random access related parameters, and send a random access message one or more times according to the first number. The system and method are configured to determine whether to enhance an uplink transmission based on one or more random access related parameters. The system and method are further configured to determine not to enhance the uplink transmission, and send a legacy random access message. The system and method are configured to determine to enhance the uplink transmission, and send an enhanced random access message.