Uplink Resource Allocation for LTE sTTI Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In LTE systems, the shortened transmission time interval (sTTI) mechanism results in more than 10% resource wastage due to limited resource scheduling granularity, leading to inefficiencies in uplink data transmission.

Innovation Solution

A resource allocation method that provides L resource allocation schemes, where the start location of each scheme is determined based on a resource unit other than the (S+1)th unit in the system bandwidth, allowing for more flexible and efficient allocation of resources to satisfy prime factor constraints, thereby reducing bandwidth loss and waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resource scheduling is performed using sRBG in sTTI mechanism, then resource allocation can be achieved, but more than 10% of resources cannot be scheduled causing resource waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem resource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the resource allocation space by dividing Q consecutive resource units into multiple groups and defining different resource allocation schemes for different segments. This allows the system to allocate resources at both sRBG level and individual resource unit level, enabling more granular control and reducing the 10%+ resource waste caused by coarse sRBG granularity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic resource allocation by providing L different resource allocation schemes that can be flexibly selected based on system conditions. The network device can dynamically choose from multiple allocation modes (including L1 schemes with restricted start locations and L2 schemes with (S+1)th resource unit start locations) to optimize resource utilization and adapt to varying traffic demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If resource allocation starts at (S+1)th resource unit in sRBG, then resource block group scheduling is simplified, but prime factor constraints cannot be well satisfied leading to bandwidth loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidbandwidth loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different resource allocation schemes (L1 and L2) to have different start location characteristics in different local contexts. L1 schemes use resource units other than (S+1)th units as start locations to satisfy prime factor constraints, while L2 schemes use (S+1)th units for simpler scheduling. This local differentiation enables the system to optimize for prime factor satisfaction in specific bandwidth regions without increasing overall scheduling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11490409B2Resource allocation method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1
  • US11490409B2 patent drawing
  • US11490409B2 patent drawing
  • US11490409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of this application provide resource allocation methods and apparatuses. One method includes: receiving, by a terminal device, resource allocation information that indicates a first resource, determining, by the terminal device, a second resource based on the resource allocation information and an offset value represented by M, wherein the offset value is configured based on higher layer signaling and indicates a start location of the first resource offsets from a start location of the second resource by M resource units, and sending, by the terminal device, uplink data on the second resource to a network device.