Uplink Scheduling Inversion for Rate Grant Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In UMTS wireless communication networks, existing scheduling methods often penalize high-priority users when available resources are insufficient, as they prioritize users based on a greedy filling approach that fails to ensure all users' rate requests are met.

Innovation Solution

A scheduling method that processes users starting from the lowest priority and adjusts transmission rates accordingly to maximize the likelihood of granting requested rates without penalizing high-priority users, supporting both relative and absolute rate scheduling, and controlling the uplink resource allocation to ensure efficient use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If greedy filling scheduling is used to prioritize users based on requested rates, then user rate requests are granted efficiently, but high-priority users are penalized when available resources are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate grant efficiencyVSAvoidhigh-priority user service guarantee
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional scheduling approach by processing users from lowest priority to highest priority rather than the traditional highest to lowest. This inversion ensures that high-priority users are guaranteed their requested rates whenever possible, while still allowing efficient resource utilization through the systematic inclusion of lower-priority users when resources remain available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Productivity

If traditional scheduling algorithms are used to maximize rate grants, then computational complexity increases, but implementation simplicity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate grant maximizationVSAvoidscheduler implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the user processing into distinct phases: first processing high-priority users to establish guaranteed rates, then processing lower-priority users in order to fill remaining capacity. This segmentation simplifies the scheduling logic compared to complex optimization algorithms while maintaining effective rate grant maximization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If all user rate requests are granted without resource constraints, then user satisfaction is maximized, but uplink resource overloading occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser rate request fulfillmentVSAvoiduplink resource load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the scheduler continuously monitors available uplink resources (such as rise-over-thermal margins) and adjusts rate grants accordingly. This feedback ensures that total granted rates never exceed available resources while maximizing user satisfaction through transparent and fair rate allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7995585B2Method of controlling transmission rates
Publication Date: 2011.08.09 WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC
  • US7995585B2 patent drawing
  • US7995585B2 patent drawing
  • US7995585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment of the method, an estimated use of an uplink resource by prioritized users, if transmission rates for the prioritized users are granted, is determined. The transmission rates are then granted if the estimated use of the uplink resource is less than or equal to an available amount of the uplink resource. Otherwise, the granting of transmission rates of the prioritized users is controlled in order of lower priority prioritized users to higher priority prioritized users until the estimated use of the uplink resource by the prioritized users falls within the available amount of the uplink resource for the channel.