Uplink Scheduling Grants for Mixed-Latency Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication networks face inefficiencies in uplink scheduling, particularly in handling different types of data with varying time-scale requirements, leading to wasted bandwidth and suboptimal resource utilization while maintaining quality of service (QoS) prioritization.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a wireless device and network node that allows for flexible scheduling by sending additional scheduling grants to combine or override previous grants, enabling simultaneous transmission of data with different time-scale requirements using the same or different HARQ processes, thereby optimizing resource use and reducing latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If separate scheduling is used for different data categories with different time-scale requirements, then each data category can be scheduled with its corresponding optimal offset value, but device complexity and scheduling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple scheduling grants for different data categories into a single unified scheduling mechanism. The network node sends one scheduling grant that contains multiple grant indicators, each pointing to different data categories (e.g., URLLC, eMBB, mMTC), allowing simultaneous scheduling of multiple data types without requiring separate scheduling procedures for each category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling grant is designed to serve multiple functions simultaneously - it can schedule different data categories (URLLC, eMBB, mMTC) with different time-scale requirements using a single grant structure. The grant includes flexible fields that can be configured to accommodate various data types and their specific transmission requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If early scheduling decision is made for small-timescale data, then latency is reduced, but bandwidth is wasted when actual data buffer size deviates from scheduled amount

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission latencyVSAvoidbandwidth waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling mechanism is made dynamic by allowing the network node to send additional scheduling grants that can override or supplement previous grants. The second scheduling grant received at a second time slot can modify the transmission parameters for the third time slot based on updated buffer status, enabling adaptive resource allocation that responds to actual data availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the scheduling grant mechanism where the network node receives buffer status information from the wireless device and adjusts subsequent scheduling grants accordingly. This feedback loop allows the network to optimize resource allocation based on actual data buffer states, preventing both premature transmission and resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If large time-scale offset is used for A-CSI transmission, then measurement samples can be collected and processed, but small-time-scale data is forced to use larger offset than needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoiddata transmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling grant is segmented into multiple independent grant indicators, each capable of scheduling different data categories with their own optimal time offsets. The first grant indicator can schedule A-CSI with a large offset for measurement collection, while the second grant indicator can schedule small-time-scale data with a smaller offset, allowing both to coexist without mutual interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3878228B1Methods, wireless device and network node for transmission of uplink data
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP3878228B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP3878228B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6
  • EP3878228B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

Disclosed is a method performed by a wireless device (140) for wireless transmission of data to a network node (130) of a wireless communication network (100). The method comprises receiving, from the network node (130), at a first time slot, a first scheduling grant instructing the wireless device (140) to transmit first data to the network node (130) at a third time slot, and receiving, from the network node (130), at a second time slot later than the first time slot but earlier than the third time slot, a second scheduling grant instructing the wireless device (140) to transmit second data to the network node at the third time slot. The method further comprises transmitting, to the network node (130) at the third time slot, the second data, and possibly also the first data, in uplink transmission resources of the third time slot, wherein the transmission is performed in accordance with an instruction.