Uplink Shared Channel Multiplexing for Variable Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In future radio communication systems, the variable transmission timing and duration of uplink data and control information can lead to a deterioration in communication quality when transmitted using an uplink shared channel, as existing processing methods are not adapted for flexible scheduling.

Innovation Solution

A user terminal is designed to transmit uplink data and control information using an uplink shared channel over multiple slots, with control mechanisms for multiplexing uplink control information across these slots to maintain communication quality, employing techniques like rate matching and puncture processing to optimize bit allocation and channel utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the same transmission processing as legacy LTE systems is applied to UL data and UCI in future radio communication systems with variable scheduling, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but communication quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission processing complexityVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the transmission processing method adaptable to different scheduling scenarios. The system dynamically selects between legacy processing (for fixed scheduling) and new processing (for variable scheduling), allowing the processing complexity to adjust based on the scheduling flexibility requirement while maintaining communication quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters based on the scheduling type. For variable scheduling, it applies rate matching processing that accounts for the variable nature of UL data and UCI transmissions, whereas legacy fixed scheduling uses traditional processing methods. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing communication quality for each scheduling scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If variable transmission timing and duration are implemented for UL data and UCI, then scheduling flexibility is improved, but communication quality deteriorates without adapted processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the transmission processing dynamic by introducing a determination mechanism that adapts the processing method based on whether the scheduling is fixed or variable. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain communication quality while supporting variable transmission timing and duration, as the processing is automatically adjusted to match the scheduling flexibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the transmission processing into distinct paths: one for fixed scheduling (legacy processing) and another for variable scheduling (new processing with rate matching). This segmentation allows each processing path to be optimized for its specific scheduling type, maintaining communication quality while enabling scheduling flexibility where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If rate matching processing is applied to variable scheduling scenarios, then communication quality is maintained, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing rate matching processing specifically for variable scheduling scenarios. The processing parameters (such as the number of bits to transmit) are dynamically adjusted based on the variable nature of UL data and UCI, maintaining communication quality while accounting for the increased processing requirements of flexible scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining whether rate matching processing is needed based on the scheduling type. The determination is made within the system itself without requiring external control, allowing the processing complexity to be applied only when necessary for variable scheduling, thus balancing quality maintenance with complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4221418B1User terminal and radio communication method
Publication Date: 2024.06.26 NTT DOCOMO INC
  • EP4221418B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4221418B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4221418B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

To prevent deterioration of communication quality even when uplink data and uplink control information are transmitted by using an uplink shared channel in a future radio communication system, one aspect of a user terminal according to the present invention includes: a transmission section that transmits an uplink shared channel over multiple slots based on an instruction from a base station; and a control section that performs control to multiplex uplink control information on the uplink shared channel in at least one slot of the plurality of slots to transmit.