Upper Body Heat Exchanger Layout for Low-Drag Vehicle Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat transfer systems in vehicles are limited in their ability to provide sufficient cooling or temperature regulation due to their impact on aerodynamic performance and packaging, especially when positioned at the front of the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

An upper body heat exchanger is mounted on the vehicle with a plurality of fins on one surface and heat transfer fluid passages on another, exposed to airflow to efficiently transfer heat from heated fluid to air, enhancing cooling and temperature regulation while minimizing drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If heat exchangers are positioned at the front of the vehicle to receive maximum airflow, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates and packaging becomes constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is repositioned from the conventional front position to the upper body surface of the vehicle, utilizing the vertical/dorsal dimension for heat transfer. This dimensional relocation allows the heat exchanger to access airflow from above while clearing the front aerodynamic path, thus resolving the contradiction between heat transfer efficiency and aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The upper body surface of the vehicle serves dual functions: maintaining aerodynamic streamline flow and housing the heat exchanger for thermal management. By integrating the heat exchanger into the upper body structure, the vehicle surface simultaneously performs aerodynamic and thermodynamic functions, eliminating the need for separate front-mounted heat exchanger space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more vehicle systems require heat transfer systems, then temperature regulation capability is improved, but packaging space is reduced and aerodynamic performance is impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature regulation capabilityVSAvoidpackaging space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple heat transfer systems are accommodated by utilizing the upper body surface dimension rather than consuming internal packaging space. The heat exchangers are positioned on the external upper surface, allowing multiple systems to be integrated without compromising internal volume for other vehicle components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Temperature

If conventional heat transfer systems are used, then cooling function is provided, but aerodynamic drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling functionVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger operates in the upper airflow dimension rather than the front airflow path, allowing cooling function to be achieved without disrupting the primary aerodynamic flow along the vehicle's length. This separates the thermal management airflow path from the propulsive airflow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchanger is positioned at a specific location on the upper body where airflow characteristics are optimized for heat transfer while minimizing disruption to overall vehicle aerodynamics. The local airflow interaction at the upper surface provides adequate cooling without the drag penalties associated with front-mounted systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved cooling and temperature regulation for vehicle systems and components while maintaining aerodynamic performance by effectively transferring heat through airflow interaction with the heat exchanger's fins and fluid passages.

Implementation Method 1

heat transfer fluid passages are configured to transfer heat from heated fluid flowing through the plurality of heat transfer fluid passages to airflows interacting with the plurality of fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

first portion comprising a plurality of fins disposed on a first surface... plurality of heat transfer fluid passages disposed on a second surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction (thermal): Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11890923B2Upper body heat exchanger for vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11890923B2 patent drawing
  • US11890923B2 patent drawing
  • US11890923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of an upper body heat exchanger for a vehicle. In one embodiment, an upper body heat exchanger includes a first portion having a plurality of fins disposed on a first surface. The upper body heat exchanger also includes a second portion having a plurality of heat transfer fluid passages disposed on a second surface of the upper body heat exchanger. The second portion is beneath the first portion. The upper body heat exchanger is mounted on the vehicle such that the first surface of the first portion of the upper body heat exchanger is exposed. The plurality of heat transfer fluid passages are configured to transfer heat from heated fluid flowing through the plurality of heat transfer fluid passages to airflows interacting with the plurality of fins as the vehicle is moving.