Upper-Limb Prosthetic Springs With Piezoresistive Throw Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 3D printed prosthetics lack the fine motor control and haptic feedback necessary for high-dexterity tasks, particularly in sports-specific applications, such as basketball, where precise force and positional feedback are crucial.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic hand with coil springs that provide energy return and haptic feedback, made using multi-material 3D printing, where the conductivity changes with strain, allowing for sensing of force applied during tasks like throwing a basketball, reducing the need for electronic components and enhancing control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional 3D printed prosthetics are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but haptic feedback capability and fine motor control are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehaptic feedback capabilityVSAvoidelectronic components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the spring's mechanical function with the sensor function by integrating conductive material directly into the spring structure during 3D printing. The spring serves both as an energy storage element and as a strain sensor, eliminating the need for separate electronic sensing components while providing accurate haptic feedback capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by incorporating conductive material (such as conductive plastic or metal-infused filament) into the spring structure during multi-material 3D printing. This creates a spring that simultaneously possesses mechanical elasticity and electrical conductivity, enabling both energy return and strain sensing functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If multi-material 3D printing with conductive material is used, then haptic feedback is enabled, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconductivity-based strain sensingVSAvoidmulti-material 3D printing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The conductive material is pre-integrated into the spring structure during the 3D printing process itself, rather than being added as a separate component afterward. This preliminary integration of sensing capability into the manufacturing process reduces post-processing complexity and assembly steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If coil springs with energy return are used, then energy efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy returnVSAvoidspring mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring provides energy return through its inherent elastic properties without requiring external power sources or complex control systems. The multi-material spring is self-powered, converting mechanical energy to electrical signals autonomously through its conductivity changes during deformation, eliminating the need for separate power and sensing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The prosthetic hand enables users to perform tasks with less energy expenditure and greater fine-tuned control by providing energy return and haptic feedback, simulating the biomechanics of a natural hand, thus improving athletic performance.

Implementation Method 1

a coil spring that provides energy return and that has a conductivity that varies in relation to an amount of strain on the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the springs are made by multi-material 3D printing (additive manufacturing). Such springs made by multi-material 3D printing may include a first material that is electrically non-conductive (insulative) and a second material that electrically conductive. The extent of the deformation or strain of the spring may be determined or estimated by measuring the conductivity or resistivity of the electrically conductive material portion of the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4193968A1Upper extremity prosthetic with energy return system
Publication Date: 2023.06.14 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • EP4193968A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4193968A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4193968A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An upper-extremity prosthetic is adapted to engage with an athletic ball. The prosthetic includes one or more springs that provide energy return as a user is throwing the ball using the prosthetic. The springs can have a conductivity that changes in relation to an amount of strain or deformation of the spring. The change in conductivity can be used to provide haptic feedback to the user so the user can sense the amount of force being applied to throw the ball. In some embodiments, the springs are made by a multi-material 3D printing (additive manufacturing) process and include a first material that is electrically non-conductive and a second material that electrically conductive. In some embodiments, the prosthetic also includes one or more cantilevered springs that are also adapted to engage with the ball and to provide energy return while throwing the ball.