UPS Automatic Mode Switching for Energy and Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing UPS systems require manual switching between Normal Mode and Eco Mode, which is inconvenient and does not adapt to different user requirements or power conditions, leading to inefficiencies in energy-saving and electrical safety.

Innovation Solution

A method for a UPS system that allows automatic or manual selection of operating modes based on collected power environment, load status, and usage data, enabling automatic switching between Eco Mode and Normal Mode to prioritize energy-saving or electrical safety, with manual parameter settings for specific user needs and emergency scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual switching between Normal Mode and Eco Mode is implemented, then the system provides operational control, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to frequent manual intervention required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidtime spent on switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically monitors power quality parameters and performs mode switching without requiring user intervention. The control system self-manages the transition between Normal Mode and Eco Mode based on real-time power condition assessment, eliminating the need for users to manually switch modes and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors power quality parameters and uses this feedback to automatically determine when to switch between Normal Mode and Eco Mode. The control system adjusts operating mode based on real-time feedback from power quality sensors, providing adaptive operation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If automatic mode switching is implemented, then the ease of operation improves, but the reliability deteriorates due to potential loss of manual control in emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidelectrical safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides dynamic control capabilities where users can switch between automatic and manual control modes as needed. The control system adapts its level of automation based on user preferences and situational requirements, allowing full automatic operation for convenience while enabling manual override when reliability and direct control are priorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows users to pre-configure control preferences and parameters before automatic operation begins. Users can set up their desired level of automation, switching thresholds, and emergency protocols in advance, so that when automatic mode switching is activated, the system already has predetermined instructions for handling various scenarios, ensuring both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple circuit modules are used for voltage regulation and power conversion, then the electrical safety improves, but the energy consumption worsens due to power loss in each module

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical safetyVSAvoidpower loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between Normal Mode (with full circuit modules for maximum electrical safety) and Eco Mode (with bypass configuration for minimum energy loss) based on real-time power quality conditions. When power quality is good, the system uses Eco Mode to reduce energy consumption by bypassing circuit modules. When power quality deteriorates, the system transitions to Normal Mode to ensure electrical safety, thus dynamically balancing safety and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides both manual and automatic parameter setting options, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity worsens due to multiple configuration modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed to perform multiple functions: it can operate in fully automatic mode, manual mode, or hybrid mode where users can configure specific parameters while leaving others automatic. This multi-functional control architecture allows the same system to adapt to different user needs and skill levels without requiring separate systems, thus improving adaptability while managing complexity through a unified control interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9812899B2Method for automatically strengthening energy-saving and electrical safety
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 CYBER POWER SYST
  • US9812899B2 patent drawing
  • US9812899B2 patent drawing
  • US9812899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically strengthening energy-saving and electrical safety is disclosed used in a UPS system to perform auto execution of energy-saving and power usage setting. In auto execution, manual setting and auto setting are provided for selection. When entering manual setting, it is to set power environment, time or empirical parameter setting. When entering auto setting, the system will collect power environment, load status and power usage data, and then make sure of priority judgment condition, and then perform data statistic and storage, and then automatically execute Eco Mode or Normal Mode after analysis and judgment. Thus, a user can let the UPS system to collect analyzed data, and then automatically switch the operating mode according to the analysis, enhancing ease of use and lowering the use threshold.