Upsampling Optical Transmitter With Digital Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) optical communication systems face challenges in optimizing data capacity due to trade-offs between modulation formats, channel spacing, and noise susceptibility, leading to suboptimal performance over varying fiber lengths and types, with fixed optical demultiplexers being costly and inflexible.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a combination of optical transmitters, a combiner, photodiodes, and digital signal processing circuits with variable bandwidth filters and interpolation, allowing for flexible channel spacing and bandwidth adjustment to optimize data capacity based on fiber type and distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher rate modulation formats are employed to carry data at higher rates, then data capacity is improved, but noise susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capacityVSAvoidnoise susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts modulation format parameters based on channel conditions and distance. Different modulation formats (e.g., BPSK, QPSK, 8-QAM) are selected for different channels depending on their noise susceptibility and the required data rate, optimizing the trade-off between capacity and reliability for each channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic adaptation where modulation formats can be changed based on real-time channel conditions. This allows the system to switch between higher rate modulation formats for shorter distances with lower noise and more robust formats for longer distances with higher noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If increased numbers of channels are provided to increase capacity, then data capacity is improved, but cross-talk and non-linear effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata capacityVSAvoidcross-talk and non-linear effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts channel spacing parameters based on the number of channels being transmitted. When more channels are activated, the system increases the spacing between adjacent channels to reduce cross-talk and non-linear effects like XPM, thereby maintaining signal integrity while maximizing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Channel spacing is made dynamic rather than fixed. The system can adjust the spectral separation between channels in real-time based on the total number of active channels and the observed interference levels, allowing flexible optimization of capacity versus interference trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If optical demultiplexers are tailored for each WDM system to optimize capacity, then system performance is improved, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal optical demultiplexer design that can handle multiple WDM configurations through electronic signal processing rather than custom optical components. A single demultiplexer unit can serve different system requirements by adjusting electronic filter parameters, eliminating the need for expensive custom-tailored optical demultiplexers for each system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces custom optical demultiplexing hardware with electronic signal processing. Instead of using specialized optical components tailored for each WDM system, the invention uses electronic filters and signal processing circuits to achieve channel separation, significantly reducing device cost and complexity while maintaining system optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed optical demultiplexers are used, then device cost is reduced, but adaptability to different fiber types and lengths is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice costVSAvoidadaptability to fiber characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic electronic filtering and signal processing that can be adjusted in real-time to match different fiber characteristics and transmission distances. The electronic filters can change their parameters to optimize performance for various fiber types, making the system adaptable without requiring custom hardware for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes electronic processing parameters such as filter bandwidth, equalization coefficients, and signal processing algorithms to adapt to different fiber characteristics. This allows a single demultiplexer design to optimize performance across different fiber types and lengths by adjusting software/control parameters rather than hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables flexible channel spacing and bandwidth tuning, reducing errors and noise, and optimizing data capacity without the need for expensive, tailored optical demultiplexers, thereby enhancing the performance of WDM optical communication systems.

Implementation Method 1

a photodiode configured to receive a portion of each of the plurality of first optical signals and supply a first electrical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9166696B2Upsampling optical transmitter
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 INFINERA CORP
  • US9166696B2 patent drawing
  • US9166696B2 patent drawing
  • US9166696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus including a photodiode, a low pass filter, an analog-to-digital converter, an interpolation circuit and a digital signal processor is disclosed. The photodiode receives a portion of a plurality of optical signals, each of which is modulated in accordance with a corresponding one of a plurality of data streams, and each having a corresponding one of a plurality of wavelengths. The photodiode supplies an electrical output. The low-pass filter supplies a filtered output in response to the electrical output. The analog-to-digital converter is configured to sample the filtered output at a first sampling rate to generate a plurality of first data samples. The interpolation circuit is configured to receive the plurality of first data samples and supply a plurality of second data samples at a second sampling rate less the first sampling rate. The digital signal processor circuit is configured to receive the plurality of second data samples.