Up-selling Tool Optimizing Net Profit via Packaging Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

E-commerce merchants face challenges in up-selling products due to the lack of consideration for packaging and shipping ramifications, leading to increased costs and potential net losses, especially when using carriers with dimensional weight rate structures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing an up-selling tool that simulates optimal packaging solutions and calculates incremental shipping and packaging costs to determine the adjusted net profit of up-selling products, allowing for informed decisions on which products to offer for up-selling based on available box sizes and carrier rate structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If merchants up-sell products with high gross margin, then product profitability improves, but packaging and shipping costs increase due to required reconfigurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenet profitVSAvoidpackaging reconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation of packaging reconfigurations before actual up-selling occurs. By pre-calculating the packaging and shipping costs for potential up-sell scenarios, the system enables merchants to make informed decisions about which products to up-sell without incurring unexpected costs, thus resolving the contradiction between profitability and operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to merchants about the financial implications of up-selling decisions by simulating packaging and shipping costs in advance. This feedback mechanism allows merchants to adjust their up-selling strategies to maximize net profit while avoiding costly reconfigurations, addressing both the profitability and complexity aspects of the contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If merchants use dimensional weight rate structures, then shipping cost accuracy improves, but the complexity of calculating optimal packaging increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping cost calculation accuracyVSAvoidpackaging optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the complex calculations of dimensional weight and optimal packaging configuration without requiring manual intervention. By implementing self-service calculation, the system achieves accurate shipping cost measurement while eliminating the operational complexity that would otherwise burden the merchant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual packaging optimization processes with automated computational algorithms that handle dimensional weight calculations and packaging selection. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with digital computation achieves precise cost calculation while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If merchants simulate packaging reconfigurations for each up-sell scenario, then net profit calculation accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenet profit calculation accuracyVSAvoidsimulation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs packaging simulations selectively rather than exhaustively for all possible scenarios. By identifying and simulating only the most relevant up-sell scenarios based on product characteristics and customer profiles, the system achieves sufficient accuracy for net profit calculation while significantly reducing processing time compared to complete enumeration of all possibilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8019643B2System and method for incorporating packaging and shipping ramifications of net profit/loss when up-selling
Publication Date: 2011.09.13 QUIDSI
  • US8019643B2 patent drawing
  • US8019643B2 patent drawing
  • US8019643B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An up-sell and down-sell method and system that considers a ranking of the individual marginal profit/loss of adding every product SKU of a merchant to an order (or a certain subset of SKU's based on other criteria), considering not only certain traditional fixed metrics the merchant may define such as product gross margins, credit card fees and labor costs (the cost of the pick)—but most importantly, variable packaging and shipping costs as well. In particular, the invention focuses on the packaging and shipping ramifications of up-selling every potential merchant SKU (or a certain subset of SKU's based on other criteria) to customer's order and down-selling each item already in customer's order. Once an adjusted net profit/loss ranking by SKU is available that considers variable shipping and packaging ramifications of up-selling such SKU to an existing order, a merchant can then determine to factor such ranking in how it up-sells or down-sells—including but not limited to up-selling certain SKU's and not others, structuring different discounts on different SKU's and potentially incentivizing customers to delete certain items in their order.