Uranium Beneficiation via Hydrocyclone Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current uranium ore beneficiation processes are inefficient due to the presence of fine clay and carbonate minerals, which hinder uranium recovery and increase processing costs, especially in low-grade ores containing these minerals.

Innovation Solution

A uranium beneficiation process involving a hydrocyclone step to separate fine gangue material, followed by flotation to separate carbonate minerals from uranium minerals, thereby producing a higher-grade uranium concentrate for downstream leaching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional beneficiation processes are used on low-grade uranium ores containing fine clay and carbonate minerals, then processing can proceed with standard methods, but uranium recovery is hindered and processing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuranium recoveryVSAvoidfine clay and carbonate minerals interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the ore processing into distinct stages: hydrocyclone classification to separate fine gangue from coarser uranium-bearing material, followed by flotation separation. This segmentation allows each stage to address specific mineralogical challenges, improving overall uranium recovery while managing the interference from fine clay and carbonate minerals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrocyclone step performs preliminary separation by rejecting fine gangue material before the main flotation process. This preliminary action removes problematic fine clay particles that would otherwise interfere with subsequent uranium mineral separation and increase reagent consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If fine gangue material is not rejected, then the processing flow can remain simple, but carbonate mineral separation from uranium minerals becomes less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcarbonate mineral separation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrocyclone performs a preliminary classification action that removes fine gangue material before flotation. This preliminary step simplifies the overall process by pre-concentrating the uranium-bearing material and removing interfering fines, thereby improving subsequent carbonate mineral separation efficiency without adding excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The process extracts and removes fine gangue material through the hydrocyclone step, separating it from the uranium-bearing concentrate. This extraction of harmful fine particles improves the effectiveness of subsequent flotation operations for separating carbonate minerals from uranium minerals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If fine gangue material is rejected through hydrocyclone, then uranium recovery improves and reagent consumption reduces, but an additional processing step is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuranium recovery and reagent efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of processing steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process divides uranium ore treatment into segmented stages: hydrocyclone classification followed by flotation. This segmentation improves uranium recovery and reduces reagent consumption by removing fine gangue before flotation, while keeping each individual step relatively simple and well-established

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrocyclone step changes the particle size distribution parameter of the feed material to flotation by rejecting fine gangue. This parameter change improves flotation efficiency and uranium recovery, and the hydrocyclone technology itself is well-established, limiting the increase in overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process effectively rejects fine particulate waste, improving uranium recovery and reducing reagent consumption, allowing for the use of an acid leach circuit instead of a more complex alkali leach, thereby lowering costs and enhancing processing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

performing a hydrocyclone step to produce an underflow fraction and an overflow fraction according to a size separation parameter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrocyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

performing a hydrocyclone step to produce an underflow fraction and an overflow fraction according to a size separation parameter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal separation: Centrifugal Separation

Implementation Method 3

treating the underflow fraction in a separation step to separate carbonate minerals from the uranium minerals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlotation: Froth Floatation

Data Source

PatentUS11421300B2Beneficiation process for enhancing uranium mineral processing
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 URANIUM BENEFICIATION
  • US11421300B2 patent drawing
  • US11421300B2 patent drawing
  • US11421300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a beneficiation process for uranium ores comprising clay and carbonate minerals, the process comprising: performing a hydrocyclone step to obtain a hydrocyclone underflow fraction substantially comprising the uranium component; treating the hydrocyclone underflow fraction to effect a separation of carbonate and uranium minerals; and recovering the uranium-bearing minerals to produce a uranium concentrate.