Urban Land Layout Optimization Using Nested Plot-Grid Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing urban land layout optimization methods rely heavily on personal experience, leading to difficulties in accurately quantifying multiple planning objectives and obtaining precise land use layout plans, and fail to consider carbon costs associated with land use function adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A low-carbon urban land layout optimization method using a genetic algorithm with vector plots and nested grid points, incorporating objective functions for low-carbon transportation, urban heat island reduction, and carbon cost control, along with constraints to optimize land use layout.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If grid units are used as analysis units in simulation, then the simulation can be performed, but it leads to excessive computation and land use fragmentation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation efficiencyVSAvoidland use accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested structure where grid units are embedded within vector plot units. The vector plot unit serves as the primary analysis unit for land use simulation, while grid units are nested inside to provide detailed computational support. This nested approach allows the system to leverage the spatial accuracy of vector units while utilizing the computational simplicity of grid units only where necessary, thereby reducing overall computation while maintaining land use accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Manufacturing precision

If vector plot units are used as analysis units, then land use structure can be controlled, but it is difficult to accurately identify neighborhood conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveland use structure controlVSAvoidneighborhood condition identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By nesting grid units within vector plot units, the system combines the advantages of both approaches. The vector plot unit maintains land use structure control through its geometric boundaries, while the nested grid units provide fine-grained spatial resolution for accurately identifying neighborhood conditions and spatial relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If optimization focuses only on land use carbon emissions and traffic carbon emissions, then these aspects can be improved, but the carbon cost caused by land use function adjustment is ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidcarbon cost information
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the carbon emission assessment into three distinct components: land use carbon emissions, traffic carbon emissions, and carbon costs from land use function adjustments. By dividing the overall carbon assessment into these separate segments, the system can independently evaluate and optimize each component, ensuring that the carbon costs associated with land use changes are not overlooked and can be appropriately managed in the optimization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If traditional screening methods are used for adjustable plots, then the process can be completed, but the screening method needs to be improved for better accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening efficiencyVSAvoidadjustable plot identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a multi-objective feedback mechanism that evaluates adjustable plots based on multiple criteria including carbon emissions, heat island effect, and land use structure. The genetic algorithm iteratively refines the selection of adjustable plots by receiving feedback from these multiple objective functions, continuously improving the accuracy of plot identification while maintaining screening efficiency through automated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method accurately quantifies planning objectives, reducing reliance on personal experience and enhancing the precision of land use layout plans by leveraging global and holistic characteristics of the genetic algorithm.

Implementation Method 1

in a genetic algorithm, using a vector plot with internal nested grid points as a simulation analysis unit to simulate the land layout optimization scheme, in a simulation process, using the simulation analysis unit for selecting, crossing, and mutating in the genetic algorithm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGenetic algorithm:

Data Source

PatentUS20260080488A1Low-carbon urban land layout optimization simulation method, system and equipment
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 SHANDONG JIANZHU UNIV
  • US20260080488A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080488A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080488A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A low-carbon urban land layout optimization simulation method includes establishing a land layout optimization scheme by determining the objective function and constraint conditions of the adjustable land layout optimization; the objective function includes the first objective function to achieve low-carbon transportation, the second objective function to reduce the urban heat island effect, and the third objective function to control and adjust the carbon cost; the vector plot with internal nested grid points is used as the simulation analysis unit, and the genetic algorithm is used to simulate the land layout optimization scheme. In the simulation process, the simulation analysis unit is used to select, cross, and mutate in the genetic algorithm, and finally, the optimal land layout scheme is selected. The method uses the global and holistic characteristics of a genetic algorithm to screen out the optimal land use layout scheme.