Urea Fertilizer Crush Strength via Polymer Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional urea fertilizers often suffer from low crush strength and high biuret content, which can lead to clumping and storage issues, and biuret toxicity in plants.

Innovation Solution

A solid, flowable fertilizer is developed by combining a urea-formaldehyde polymer with a urea source, such as molten or solid urea, and granulating it to enhance crush strength and reduce biuret content, using polymethyl urea resin with reactive methylol groups and optionally blending with an aqueous urea formaldehyde solution or adding urease inhibitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional urea fertilizer is used, then nitrogen delivery is provided, but crush strength is low and biuret content is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrush strengthVSAvoidbiuret content
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines urea with a polymeric material (such as polyacrylamide or other water-soluble polymers) to create a composite fertilizer formulation. This composite structure provides the desired crush strength while the polymer matrix helps control biuret formation and release, simultaneously addressing both the strength requirement and the biuret content issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the fertilizer by controlling granulation conditions, moisture content, and polymer-to-urea ratios. By adjusting these parameters during manufacturing, the formulation achieves optimal crush strength while minimizing biuret content through controlled reaction conditions and proper material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If granulated solid urea is stored under humid conditions, then nitrogen is available, but clumping occurs and storage properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage and handling propertiesVSAvoidclumping resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a polymeric material as an intermediary substance between urea granules. This polymer acts as a spacer and moisture barrier, preventing direct contact between urea granules that would lead to clumping. The intermediary material maintains granule separation while allowing nitrogen release, thus improving storage stability without compromising nitrogen availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous or hydrophilic polymeric materials that can absorb excess moisture while maintaining air circulation. These porous structures allow controlled moisture management, preventing the conditions that lead to clumping while still permitting nitrogen delivery to plants, thereby improving both storage stability and nitrogen availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Object-generated harmful factors

If aqueous urea formaldehyde solution is used, then biuret content can be controlled, but crush strength and storage properties are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiuret contentVSAvoidcrush strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs phase transition during the granulation process, where the aqueous urea formaldehyde solution is applied to urea granules and then dried. The controlled evaporation and drying process transforms the liquid binder into a solid matrix that provides crush strength while maintaining the low biuret content benefits of the aqueous solution formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the need for high mechanical compression (which would be required to achieve sufficient crush strength in conventional formulations) with chemical bonding through the polymeric material. The polymer provides structural integrity through molecular adhesion rather than mechanical compression, allowing low biuret content formulations to achieve adequate crush strength without excessive mechanical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a fertilizer with improved crush strength, reduced biuret content, and enhanced storage and handling properties, preventing clumping and minimizing biuret toxicity, while maintaining effective nitrogen delivery for plant growth.

Implementation Method 1

The UFP absorbs ammonia, which may prevent the undesirable formation of biuret.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 2

combining a solid, flowable urea formaldehyde polymer (UFP) with a urea source such as molten urea and/or solid urea and granulated to produce a solid fertilizer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGranulation:

Data Source

PatentUS9517973B2Solid urea fertilizer
Publication Date: 2016.12.13 KOCH AGRONOMIC SERVICES LLC

AI summary

A solid urea fertilizer prepared by mixing a solid, flowable, urea formaldehyde polymer with a urea source, such as molten or solid urea to form a fertilizer that has favorable crush strength characteristics, low biuret content, and/or desirable storage and handling properties. The urea fertilizer may contain additionally, an aqueous urea formaldehyde solution or mixture. Optionally, the fertilizer may contain a urease inhibitor and/or a nitrification inhibitor.