Urea Plant Medium-Pressure Condenser Capacity Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Urea plants face limitations in capacity expansion due to bottlenecks in the high-pressure section, particularly in the stripper and condenser, leading to inefficiencies and the inability to utilize increased steam pressure effectively, making it difficult to increase production without modifying expensive equipment.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a medium-pressure condenser at 0.5-12 MPa, which condenses gases from the high-pressure synthesis section and incorporates a carbamate stream from a recovery section, allowing part of the condensate to be returned to the high-pressure condenser, thereby increasing condensation capacity without enlarging the high-pressure condenser and maintaining steam pressure control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the liquid load of the stripping zone is increased to increase capacity, then the throughput of process streams increases, but the stripping effect is lost due to flooding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidstripping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the condensation process into two pressure stages: a high-pressure condensation stage (10-50 bar) and a low-pressure condensation stage (1-10 bar). This segmentation allows the high-pressure stripper to operate at increased liquid loads without flooding, as the condensation burden is shared between two stages. The high-pressure condenser handles initial condensation while the low-pressure condenser completes the process, preventing overload at any single stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the feed of gas to be condensed is increased to increase capacity, then the throughput increases, but the steam pressure becomes too low to be usable

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecapacityVSAvoidsteam pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The condensation process is segmented into two pressure zones. The high-pressure condenser (10-50 bar) maintains steam pressure at usable levels for plant operations, while the low-pressure condenser (1-10 bar) handles the remaining condensation load. This allows increased gas feed rates without compromising the pressure quality of generated steam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary pressure stage between the high-pressure synthesis section and the low-pressure recovery section. The high-pressure condenser acts as an intermediary that maintains pressure levels suitable for steam utilization, bridging the gap between high-pressure synthesis and low-pressure recovery operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the high-pressure condenser is enlarged to increase condensation capacity, then the condensation capacity increases, but the investment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecondensation capacityVSAvoidinvestment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of enlarging the high-pressure condenser, the invention segments the condensation function into two separate condensers operating at different pressures. The existing high-pressure condenser operates at its original size and pressure range (10-50 bar), while a new low-pressure condenser (1-10 bar) handles the additional capacity requirement, avoiding the high cost of enlarging high-pressure equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the pressure parameter of the condensation process by operating one condenser at high pressure (10-50 bar) and another at low pressure (1-10 bar). This parameter change allows capacity expansion without requiring high-pressure equipment to be enlarged, significantly reducing investment costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for a 20-40% capacity increase in urea plant production with minimal investment, maintaining reactor conversion efficiency and enabling controlled steam pressure for effective use in the low-pressure sections.

Implementation Method 1

gases leaving the high-pressure synthesis section are condensed in a medium-pressure condenser at 0.5-12 MPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 2

to which also a carbamate stream from one of the recovery sections is supplied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS7622609B2Process for the preparation of urea
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 STAMICARBON BV
  • US7622609B2 patent drawing
  • US7622609B2 patent drawing
  • US7622609B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for the preparation of urea from ammonia and carbon dioxide in a urea plant that contains a high-pressure synthesis section and one or more recovery section(s) at a lower pressure, the high-pressure synthesis section comprising a reactor, a stripper and a condenser, with gases leaving the high-pressure synthesis section being condensed in a medium-pressure condenser at 0.5-12 MPa to which also a carbamate stream from one of the recovery sections is supplied, after which at least a part of the formed condensate is supplied to the high-pressure condenser.