Urea Production via Membrane Separation and Segmented Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for producing urea face challenges in achieving high yields and purity due to incomplete conversion of ammonium carbamate to urea, especially with increased water or CO2 concentrations, and the presence of contaminants like water, ammonia, and carbon dioxide in the resulting solution.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the combination of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and a carbamate solution in a pressurized mixer to form a carbamate reaction mixture, which is then heated in a reactor with membrane separation to produce a urea reaction mixture. This mixture is further processed through multiple isolated zones with membranes to separate urea from contaminants, followed by a urea purification system using separators and decomposers to achieve high purity urea products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods are used to produce urea by reacting ammonia and carbon dioxide, then the process is simple, but the conversion of ammonium carbamate to urea is incomplete and yields are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurea yieldVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction process is divided into multiple sequential reactors (first reactor for ammonium carbamate formation, second reactor for urea conversion) with intermediate separation stages. This segmentation allows each reactor to be optimized for specific reaction conditions, improving overall urea yield while managing process complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Ammonium carbamate is pre-formed in the first reactor before being transferred to the second reactor for urea conversion. This preliminary action ensures complete carbamate formation and allows optimization of conversion conditions in the second reactor, thereby improving overall productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If water or CO2 concentration is increased in the reaction mixture, then the reaction proceeds easier, but the conversion of ammonium carbamate to urea decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction easeVSAvoidurea conversion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The process separates carbamate formation (exothermic, benefits from water/CO2) and urea conversion (endothermic, inhibited by water/CO2) into distinct reaction stages. The first reactor operates with higher water/CO2 for ease of carbamate formation, while the second reactor minimizes these components to maximize urea conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Water and excess CO2 are removed from the reaction mixture between the first and second reactors through flash separation and gas-liquid separation. This extraction of inhibiting components from the carbamate solution before the second reaction stage improves urea conversion while maintaining ease of operation in the first stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If temperature is increased to improve ammonium carbamate to urea conversion, then conversion increases, but energy consumption increases and decomposition occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature profile is segmented across two reactors: the first reactor operates at moderate temperature for carbamate formation, while the second reactor operates at higher temperature (180-220°C) for urea conversion. This segmentation allows high conversion in the second stage without excessive energy input overall, as the first stage operates efficiently at lower temperature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process optimizes temperature as a variable parameter in each reaction stage. The second reactor temperature is specifically controlled at 180-220°C to achieve high urea conversion while minimizing unwanted decomposition reactions, balancing conversion efficiency with energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple purification steps are added to remove contaminants, then purity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurea purityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Purification is segmented into multiple sequential stages: flash separation removes bulk water and CO2, gas-liquid separation removes dissolved gases, and crystallization/centrifugation removes residual impurities. Each stage targets specific contaminants, achieving high purity through modular purification units rather than a single complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different contaminant types are selectively extracted at different stages: water and CO2 are extracted in flash and gas-liquid separation stages, while residual impurities are removed in crystallization. This staged extraction approach achieves high purity by removing each contaminant type through its most effective method

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly increases urea yield and purity, effectively removing contaminants and improving the conversion efficiency by utilizing membrane separation and multiple purification steps, resulting in a urea product with high concentrations of urea and minimal impurities.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the urea reaction mixture to a membrane to separate the urea reaction mixture into an aqueous filtrate and a urea concentrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 2

combining ammonia, carbon dioxide, and a carbamate solution in a pressurized mixer to produce a carbamate reaction mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 3

heating the carbamate reaction mixture in the reactor to produce a urea reaction mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10287241B2Methods and systems for producing urea
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INC
  • US10287241B2 patent drawing
  • US10287241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for producing urea are provided. Ammonia, carbon dioxide, and a carbamate solution can be combined in a pressurized mixer to produce a carbamate reaction mixture. The carbamate reaction mixture can be transferred from the pressurized mixer to a reactor. The carbamate reaction mixture can be heated in the reactor to produce a urea reaction mixture that can include urea, water, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and ammonium carbamate. The urea reaction mixture can be contacted to a membrane to separate an aqueous filtrate and a urea concentrate that can include urea, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and ammonium carbamate. The urea concentrate can be transferred from the reactor to a urea purification system that can include one or more separators and one or more decomposers. The urea concentrate can flow through the urea purification system to produce one or more urea products and one or more carbamate solutions.