Motor Vehicle Error Detection for Urea Metering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for monitoring urea-water solution levels and pressures in vehicle exhaust systems lack comprehensive error detection, leading to potential under- or over-metering, which can result in inadequate NOx reduction and engine inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method and arrangement where a functional control unit in a motor vehicle component assembly checks for combinations of individual errors in function modules, such as fill level and pressure sensors, to verify the presence of errors and trigger an emergency functional strategy, including warning or cut-off strategies, to ensure accurate urea-water solution monitoring and metering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive error detection for combinations of individual errors is implemented, then reliability of urea-water solution monitoring is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional check logic in the functional control unit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of error detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of control unit logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The error detection system is segmented into individual error checks for different function modules (fill level sensor, pressure sensor, metering device) within the component assembly. The functional control unit independently evaluates each function module for individual errors, then combines these evaluations to detect combinations of errors. This segmentation allows comprehensive error detection while maintaining manageable control logic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If individual errors in function modules are monitored, then measurement precision of operating supply item status is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple sensors and monitoring functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of fill level and pressure monitoringVSAvoidnumber of sensors and monitoring functions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the monitoring functions of multiple sensors (fill level sensor, pressure sensor) and the functional control unit into a unified error detection system. The functional control unit consolidates the evaluation of individual errors from different function modules and determines combinations of errors in a single integrated process, reducing the need for separate monitoring systems for each sensor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The functional control unit is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the control element for the component assembly and as the error detection system. It performs dual functions: controlling the function modules (metering device, pumps) and evaluating their operational status for individual and combined errors. This universality eliminates the need for separate dedicated error detection hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If emergency functional strategy is implemented upon error detection, then reliability of NOx reduction is improved, but productivity decreases due to engine cut-off or warning strategies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of NOx reductionVSAvoidengine operational availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The emergency functional strategy is implemented partially rather than universally. The system distinguishes between different types and combinations of errors, applying cut-off or warning strategies only when specific critical error combinations are detected that would compromise NOx reduction reliability. For less critical error combinations, the system may continue operation with monitoring, thus maintaining productivity while ensuring reliability when truly necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8249771B2Method for detecting an error in a component assembly
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US8249771B2 patent drawing
  • US8249771B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for detecting an error in a component assembly of a motor vehicle, the component assembly having a functional control unit and at least one function module to be controlled by the functional control unit as components. According to the method, a check is made by the functional control unit to determine whether a combination of individual errors is present for at least one component of the component assembly. When the combination of individual errors is thereby present, an occurrence of the error is verified by the functional control unit and a signal for implementing an emergency functional strategy is transmitted by said control unit to an engine control unit.