Urinal Odor Seal Replacement With Continuous Gas-Tight Closure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing urinal odor trap replacement methods often lead to strong ammonia odors and nuisance, especially in large facilities, due to the need to remove and install multiple odor traps simultaneously, causing odor escape and disruption.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a urinal design where an additional odor trap is automatically closed when the old one is removed and automatically opens when a new one is inserted, ensuring continuous gas-tight insulation and minimizing odor escape during replacement, with optional manual operation or actuation mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple odor traps are removed and installed simultaneously in large facilities, then replacement efficiency is improved, but strong ammonia odors and nuisance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement efficiencyVSAvoidammonia odor
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by providing a bypass connection that is pre-configured and activated before the odor trap removal process begins. The bypass allows urine flow to continue through the alternative path (container → bypass → outlet) while the odor trap is being replaced, preventing odor release without requiring simultaneous removal of multiple traps. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining productivity through continuous operation while eliminating the harmful ammonia odor that would otherwise be released.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If odor trap replacement is performed sequentially, then odor nuisance is reduced, but replacement time and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodor nuisanceVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the urine flow path into separate segments: the main path through the odor trap and an alternative bypass path. This allows the odor trap to be replaced independently while urine continues to flow through the bypass segment. The system is segmented such that the bypass connection includes a container receiving portion and an outlet portion that can operate independently of the odor trap replacement process, thereby reducing odor nuisance without causing operational disruption or time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the urinal is taken out of service for odor trap replacement, then proper replacement can be performed, but operational availability and user convenience decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement accessibilityVSAvoidoperational availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing a bypass connection as a mediator between the odor trap and the outlet. This bypass acts as an intermediate pathway that allows urine to reach the outlet even when the odor trap is removed or being replaced. The bypass connection includes a container receiving portion that can be positioned to allow access to the odor trap for replacement while maintaining urine flow through the intermediary bypass path, thus enabling replacement accessibility without compromising operational availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2627835B1Urinal, and method for replacing an odour seal of a urinal
Publication Date: 2015.03.04 URIMAT HLDG AG
  • EP2627835B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2627835B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a urinal having an odour seal (2). The urinal is characterized by provision of a further odour seal (9), preferably connected in series.