Urisheath Injection Molding with Venting and Silicone Curing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing urisheaths, such as dipping in latex or thermoplastic solutions, face issues with skin compatibility, plasticizer migration, and difficulty in controlling wall thickness, leading to potential biological and environmental concerns, as well as time-consuming and inefficient production processes.

Innovation Solution

An injection molding method using a machine with a mold featuring an annular cavity and venting area, allowing precise control of wall thickness, where silicone material is injected, cured, and removed efficiently to produce a high-quality, thin-walled urisheath with features like a push rim and roll rib, eliminating air entrapment and ensuring uniform filling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dipping method is used to produce urisheath, then production time is reduced, but wall thickness control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction timeVSAvoidwall thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of the manufacturing process from dipping to injection molding. This allows precise control of wall thickness through the injection molding process parameters while maintaining efficient production. The mold design with controlled cavity dimensions enables consistent wall thickness that cannot be achieved with the dipping method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If thermoplastic material is used, then skin compatibility is improved, but plasticizer migration causes biological safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskin compatibilityVSAvoidplasticizer migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from thermoplastic to silicone elastomer. This material substitution eliminates the plasticizer component entirely, as silicone elastomers do not require plasticizers for processing. The material maintains good skin compatibility while removing the source of plasticizer migration that causes biological safety issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If silicone material is dipped to produce urisheath, then skin friendliness is improved, but production time increases and wall thickness control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskin friendlinessVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the mechanical dipping process with an injection molding process. This substitution dramatically reduces production time because the material is injected directly into the mold cavity in a controlled manner, eliminating the need for repeated dipping and curing cycles. The injection molding process also provides precise wall thickness control through the mold design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If cavity is filled with material, then product formation is achieved, but air entrapment occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct formationVSAvoidair entrapment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention incorporates venting channels in the mold cavity before the injection process. These vents are pre-positioned to allow air to escape during material injection, preventing air entrapment. The venting system is integrated into the mold design, enabling smooth material flow and complete cavity filling without trapping air pockets in the product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables the production of thin-walled, high-quality urisheaths with controlled wall thickness, improved skin friendliness, and reduced environmental impact, while minimizing production time and avoiding plasticizer-related issues, resulting in a more durable and comfortable product.

Implementation Method 1

curing by heating said injected material in said cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8821780B2Method and machine for producing a hollow product
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 NOLATO MEDITECH
  • US8821780B2 patent drawing
  • US8821780B2 patent drawing
  • US8821780B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and injection machine for producing a hollow product, such as a urisheath, use of the method for producing a urisheath as well as the urisheath. The machine comprises an annular cavity for receiving a silicone material. The material is injected in a cold state via a coldrun nozzle (20) and cured by heat in the cavity. The cavity has a narrow cross-sectional area over a substantial portion of the cavity and the cavity is connected to a venting area (13). The cavity has an annular enlarged portion (18) at the proximal portion of the cavity, arranged adjacent said inlet (24) and a groove (14) at the distal portion of the cavity. The narrow cross-sectional area has a decreasing radial dimension towards the distal portion of the cavity. The surface of the cavity is grit blasted.