Urological Valve with Pressure-Responsive Leaflets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a urological device that improves patient quality of life by eliminating the need for a urine bag and facilitating normal social functioning, particularly for males who have experienced stress urinary incontinence due to radical prostatectomy or adjuvant radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Innovation Solution

A urological device comprising a bladder-mounted valve with a normally closed configuration that automatically opens in response to pre-set hydrodynamic pressure, allowing fluid flow and returning to the closed state when pressure is reduced, integrated with a bladder retainer and urethral support to prevent migration and ensure proper positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a valve is designed to remain closed under high pressure spikes (e.g., 900mm H2O for less than 0.5 seconds), then continence is improved, but the valve may fail to open when needed for normal voiding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontinenceVSAvoidvoiding function
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The valve incorporates a time-dependent pressure response mechanism that dynamically distinguishes between transient pressure spikes and sustained voiding pressure. The valve remains closed during brief high-pressure events (coughing, sneezing) but opens during sustained pressure application, achieving both continence and normal voiding function through temporal discrimination of pressure signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a valve is designed to open in response to preset pressure applied over preset time (e.g., 750mm H2O for at least 5 seconds), then normal voiding is facilitated, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoiding functionVSAvoidpressure-time response mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve utilizes the patient's own physiological pressure signals to automatically control opening and closing. The pressure-sensitive material and time-dependent response mechanism eliminate the need for external controls, batteries, or complex electronic systems, allowing the valve to self-regulate based on natural voiding physiology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a valve made of viscoelastic polymeric foam material is used, then the valve provides automatic pressure-responsive opening, but the manufacturing precision and material selection become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure-responsive openingVSAvoidmaterial selection and fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention utilizes the inherent viscoelastic properties of polymeric foam materials, which naturally exhibit time-dependent mechanical response to pressure. By selecting materials with appropriate viscosity and elasticity parameters, the valve achieves automatic pressure-responsive opening without requiring complex manufacturing processes or precise fabrication tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If the valve leaflets evert on movement between closed and open configuration, then the valve provides smooth transition and reduced turbulence, but the structural integrity and durability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow transitionVSAvoidvalve structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The valve incorporates reinforcing elements within the polymeric foam structure to maintain structural integrity during the eversion and return motion of the leaflets. The composite construction allows the leaflets to flex and invert smoothly for turbulent-free flow while the reinforcing structure prevents material failure over repeated cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively manages urinary incontinence by allowing controlled fluid flow without the need for constant user intervention, reducing the risk of encrustation and extending the lifespan of catheters, and improving bladder tone and social functioning.

Implementation Method 1

The valve is automatically movable from the closed configuration to the open configuration in response to a pre-set hydrodynamic pressure applied for a pre-set time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the valve returns to the closed configuration when flow through the valve has substantially stopped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic recovery: Elastic Recovery

Implementation Method 3

The valve may be of a viscoelastic polymeric foam material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelastic deformation: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3461525B1A urological device
Publication Date: 2022.07.06 COLOPLAST AS
  • EP3461525B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3461525B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3461525B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8

AI summary

A urological device 800, 810, 830, 850, 860, 870, 900, 910, 920 comprises a urological valve 802, 803, 812, 861, 901, for location in the bladder of a patient and a valve support stem 801, 813, 863, 902, for location in the urethra of a patient. The valve has a normally closed configuration to prevent flow from the bladder and an open configuration for fluid flow through the valve. The valve is automatically movable from the closed configuration to the open configuration in response to a pre-set hydrodynamic pressure applied for a pre-set time. In one case the valve has a plurality of valve leaflets with a region of co-aption between the valve leaflets. In the normally closed configuration the valve leaflets are engaged at the region of co-aption and in the open configuration the leaflets are separated at the co-aption region for fluid flow through the valve.