Usage-Based Data Transfer Control for Connected Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions for managing budgets associated with network-connected devices are inefficient, as they require manual intervention for bill payments and lack real-time adjustments based on actual usage, leading to potential overages and errors, especially when devices are outside user control or subject to variable costs like weather changes.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a centralized hub to monitor and manage network-connected devices, comparing actual usage to expected usage, automatically adjusting operations and payments, and allocating funds to a holding account for pre-authorized payments, with features for predictive adjustments based on data sources like weather forecasts and historical usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual intervention is used for bill payments and budget management, then users have direct control over payments, but the process is inefficient and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebill payment efficiencyVSAvoidpayment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic bill payment processing where the budget management system autonomously monitors usage, compares actual vs. expected usage, and executes payments without manual user intervention. The system self-manages the entire billing cycle from monitoring to payment execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual usage data from connected devices, compares it against expected usage thresholds, and uses this feedback to automatically adjust payments and notify users of budget status. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures accurate and timely payments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring and automatic adjustments are implemented, then usage accuracy and budget control are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusage measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The budget management system performs multiple functions including monitoring usage data, comparing actual vs. expected usage, calculating payments, executing transactions, and generating notifications. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single unified system rather than requiring separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines budget management, usage monitoring, payment processing, and user notification functions into an integrated platform that works with multiple connected devices. This merging reduces overall system complexity by providing a centralized management interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Speed

If automatic payment authorization is used, then payment processing speed is improved, but control over individual payments is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment processing speedVSAvoiduser control over payments
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Users pre-configure their budget parameters, usage thresholds, and payment preferences in advance. The system then uses these pre-set instructions to automatically execute payments when usage conditions are met, eliminating the need for real-time user decisions while maintaining user-defined control parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to users about their budget status, actual usage, and upcoming payments. This transparency allows users to maintain awareness and control over their automatic payment system while enjoying the speed benefits of automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Use of energy by moving object

If predictive adjustments based on weather forecasts and historical data are implemented, then energy optimization is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy usage optimizationVSAvoiddata processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses historical usage data and weather forecasts to predict future energy consumption patterns and proactively adjusts device operations or user behavior before peak consumption occurs. This predictive approach optimizes energy usage by preparing adjustments in advance rather than reacting to actual consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10853774B2Data transfer control based on connected device usage analysis
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK
  • US10853774B2 patent drawing
  • US10853774B2 patent drawing
  • US10853774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure involves systems, software, and computer-implemented methods for implementing a data transfer control based on information received from connected devices. In one instance, operations include loading an expected usage amount for a group of connected devices. Signals representing actual usage amounts associated with the group are received from at least device in the group. The actual usage amounts can be compared to the expected usage amount. An authorization of at least one payment-related action associated with the at least one group of connected devices is automatically transmitted to a payment system in response to determining that the usage amount is less than or equal to the expected amount, and at least one instruction to perform a corrective action associated with the group is automatically transmitted to at least one connected device of the group in response to determining that the actual amount exceeds the expected amount.