USB Crosstalk Detection via Signal Suspension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

USB communication systems face challenges in detecting and managing crosstalk, which can lead to interference and incorrect signal interpretation, particularly in USB 3.0 connections where signals can be misidentified due to crosstalk, affecting data transfer efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A USB crosstalk management system that includes a transceiver module and control module to detect crosstalk by suspending signal transmission and determining whether a received signal continues after suspension, allowing for adjustment of transmission frequencies to distinguish crosstalk from actual signals, thereby identifying and mitigating interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If signal transmission continues without suspension to maintain communication efficiency, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to distinguish crosstalk from actual signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsignal identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic suspension of signal transmission at specific intervals during the training sequence exchange to detect crosstalk. By temporarily stopping transmission and observing whether signals continue to be received, the system can identify crosstalk conditions without permanently halting communication, thus maintaining overall productivity while achieving accurate signal identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If transmission is suspended to detect crosstalk accurately, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to interruption of signal transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrosstalk detection accuracyVSAvoidtransmission interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs crosstalk detection during the initial training sequence exchange phase before normal data transmission begins. By conducting the suspension and detection process preliminarily during the training phase, the system achieves accurate crosstalk identification without causing time loss during actual data transmission, as the training sequence duration is relatively short and predetermined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system continuously monitors for crosstalk by suspending transmission, then reliability is improved, but productivity decreases due to frequent transmission interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddata transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic crosstalk detection only during specific training sequence phases rather than continuously during all transmission phases. This selective periodic monitoring maintains communication reliability by detecting crosstalk when it is most likely to occur during link establishment, while minimizing productivity impact by avoiding interruptions during stable data transmission phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS8797835B1Method and apparatus for detecting crosstalk between a plurality of devices communicating in accordance with a universal serial bus (USB) protocol
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US8797835B1 patent drawing
  • US8797835B1 patent drawing
  • US8797835B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A first device comprising a transceiver module configured to begin transmission of a first signal to a second device. A control module is configured to, in response to the transceiver module receiving a second signal during the transmission of the first signal to the second device, determine whether the second signal corresponds to crosstalk by having the transceiver module suspend the transmission of the first signal. In response to the transceiver module continuing to receive the second signal subsequent to the transceiver module having suspended the transmission of the first signal to the second device, the control module determines that the second signal does not correspond to crosstalk. In response to the transceiver module not continuing to receive the second signal subsequent to the transceiver module having suspended the transmission of the first signal to the second device, the control module determines that the second signal does correspond to crosstalk.