USB Connector Locking Tab Actuator Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

External USB devices, such as mobile network modems, are prone to unauthorized removal and theft during installation due to their simple pull-based connection mechanism, which complicates both connection and authorized removal, and can lead to entanglements in data centers with multiple devices.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating self-contained security mechanisms within the USB connector, featuring locking tabs and an actuator, such as a nut, that can be transitioned between positions to engage or disengage the locking tabs, providing a secure connection without additional external components, and using a threaded extension to apply force to collapsible arms for secure engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple pull-based connection mechanism is used for USB devices, then ease of connection is improved, but security against unauthorized removal deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of connectionVSAvoidsecurity against unauthorized removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is segmented into multiple functional components: a plug body, locking tabs, and an actuator mechanism. The locking tabs are separate elements that can engage with corresponding features on the host connector, creating distinct locking and unlocking phases in the connection process. This segmentation allows the connector to provide both easy insertion (plug simply inserts) and secure locking (tabs engage automatically), resolving the contradiction between ease of connection and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If additional physical coupling mechanisms are added to secure USB devices, then security against unauthorized removal is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unauthorized removalVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is merged with the connector housing itself rather than being a separate external component. The locking tabs are integrated into the plug body, and the actuator is incorporated within the connector structure. This merging eliminates the need for additional external coupling mechanisms while providing secure locking, thus improving security without significantly increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If locking mechanisms are integrated within the USB connector, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of authorized removal may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidease of authorized removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator mechanism is designed to be manually operable by the user without requiring tools or complex procedures. The actuator can be pressed or slid to automatically disengage the locking tabs, allowing authorized users to easily remove the device. The mechanism serves itself by using the user's direct input to trigger the unlocking sequence, maintaining ease of authorized removal while keeping the overall device complexity low through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents unauthorized removal by providing increased resistance and discouraging theft, while allowing authorized users to easily connect and disconnect the devices without complicating the process, thus enhancing security and reducing the risk of loss or theft.

Implementation Method 1

using a threaded extension to apply force to collapsible arms for secure engagement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreading: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS10522946B1Connectors with locking tab
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10522946B1 patent drawing
  • US10522946B1 patent drawing
  • US10522946B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, an apparatus includes a connector of an electronic device including a locking tab, wherein the connector fits into a corresponding connector of a host computing device; an arm coupled to the locking tab; and an actuator, wherein the actuator in a first position depresses the collapsible arm and disengages the locking tab; and the actuator in a second position releases the collapsible arm and engages the locking tab.