USB Port Power Prioritization With Dynamic Power Renegotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power distribution systems fail to optimally allocate power to multiple USB ports due to fixed allocation, lack of system-wide monitoring, and inability to adjust power in real-time, leading to inefficiencies and potential overloading or under-powering of devices.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent power distribution system with current sensing, downstream port prioritization, and dynamic power renegotiation, utilizing USB Power Delivery protocols to monitor and adjust power allocation based on real-time device needs, ensuring the total power draw stays within the system's capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power is distributed evenly across all USB ports, then all ports receive consistent power, but some devices receive more power than needed causing energy waste while others receive insufficient power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery reliabilityVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic power allocation that adjusts power distribution in real-time based on actual device needs. The system continuously monitors power consumption and renegotiates power allocation dynamically, transitioning from static even distribution to adaptive dynamic distribution that matches actual device requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms through current sensing and system-wide power monitoring to detect actual power consumption. This feedback enables the controller to adjust power allocation accordingly, ensuring devices receive appropriate power while preventing energy waste from over-provisioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If fixed power allocation is used, then system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to variable power demands of different devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management complexityVSAvoidpower demand adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms fixed power allocation into dynamic power allocation that adapts to varying device requirements. The system uses USB Power Delivery protocols to renegotiate power allocation in real-time, enabling flexibility while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes power allocation parameters dynamically based on device needs. By monitoring current consumption and adjusting power delivery parameters in real-time, the system achieves adaptability without requiring overly complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If system-wide power monitoring is not implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but the total power draw may exceed the power source capacity causing overloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidpower source safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements system-wide power monitoring that provides feedback on total power consumption. This feedback mechanism enables the controller to detect when power limits are approaching and adjust allocations accordingly, preventing overloading while maintaining system safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that manages power distribution based on monitored system-wide power consumption. It coordinates between individual device requests and overall power source capacity, ensuring safe operation within power limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If real-time power adjustment is not implemented, then system complexity is reduced, but power distribution remains suboptimal when device power needs change over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time control complexityVSAvoidpower distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time dynamic power adjustment that responds to changing device power needs. The system continuously monitors and renegotiates power allocation, ensuring optimal power distribution adapts to temporal variations in device requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous power optimization through ongoing monitoring and adjustment. Rather than static allocation, the system continuously adapts power distribution to match actual device needs, maximizing power utilization efficiency over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20260039137A1Charging System for Prioritized Power Distribution and Dynamic Power Adjustment
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 LEANCODE INC
  • US20260039137A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039137A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039137A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for intelligently managing and distributing power from a common power source to multiple Universal Serial Bus (USB) downstream ports. The system integrates dynamic power management capabilities that enable efficient use of the available power and ensure optimal performance of connected devices. The system acquires real-time power consumption data, including current sensing to measure real-time power consumption of the connected devices and provide system wide power monitoring, to provide port power renegotiation based upon the real-time power consumption.