USB Port Power Distribution With Dynamic Priority Renegotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power distribution systems fail to optimize power allocation across multiple USB ports due to fixed distribution, lack of system-wide monitoring, and inability to adjust power allocation in real-time, leading to inefficiencies and potential risks of overloading or under-powering devices.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent power distribution system that employs current sensing, downstream port prioritization, and dynamic power renegotiation, using USB Power Delivery protocols to manage power distribution across multiple USB ports, ensuring that the highest priority devices receive full power and reallocating power based on real-time needs and system-wide power budget.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If power is distributed evenly across all downstream ports, then all ports receive consistent power, but some devices receive more power than needed (wasting energy) while others receive insufficient power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy wasteVSAvoidpower allocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts power allocation to each downstream port based on real-time power draw measurements and device priority levels. The controller continuously monitors power consumption and renegotiates power distribution, transitioning from static even distribution to adaptive dynamic allocation that matches actual device needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power delivery parameters (voltage, current) to each downstream port based on measured power draw and priority assignments. By monitoring actual power consumption and adjusting delivery parameters accordingly, the system optimizes energy distribution to prevent both waste and insufficient power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If fixed power allocation is used, then system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot account for variable power demands of different devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management complexityVSAvoidpower distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where power draw is continuously measured at each downstream port and fed back to the controller. Based on this feedback, the controller adjusts power allocation in real-time, enabling efficient power distribution without requiring complex manual configuration or prediction of device power needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows connected devices to effectively self-report their power needs through the measurement of actual power draw. The controller uses these measurements to automatically negotiate and adjust power allocation, eliminating the need for complex pre-configuration or user intervention while maintaining high distribution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If system-wide power monitoring is implemented, then power draw can be tracked accurately, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower draw measurement accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments power monitoring into individual downstream ports, with each port having its own power draw measurement. This segmented approach allows accurate tracking of power consumption per device while keeping the monitoring architecture modular and manageable, avoiding the complexity of a monolithic monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs multiple functions including power negotiation, power draw measurement, priority management, and dynamic power allocation. By consolidating these functions into a single controller, the system achieves precise power monitoring without the complexity of separate dedicated monitoring hardware for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic power renegotiation is implemented, then power allocation adapts to real-time needs, but negotiation overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower allocation adaptabilityVSAvoidnegotiation overhead time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs power renegotiation periodically based on changes in power draw measurements rather than continuously. This periodic approach allows the system to adapt to real-time power needs while minimizing negotiation overhead by only initiating renegotiation when actual power consumption patterns change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12483056B2Charging system for prioritized power distribution and dynamic power adjustment
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 LEANCODE INC
  • US12483056B2 patent drawing
  • US12483056B2 patent drawing
  • US12483056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for intelligently managing and distributing power from a common power source to multiple Universal Serial Bus (USB) downstream ports. The system integrates dynamic power management capabilities that enable efficient use of the available power and ensure optimal performance of connected devices. The system acquires real-time power consumption data, including current sensing to measure real-time power consumption of the connected devices and provide system wide power monitoring, to provide port power renegotiation based upon the real-time power consumption.